Bastards.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: RetroSexual
If they wanted demonstrate free speech, they should've burned other countries' flags where such activities are illegal or liable to get you taken behind your house and shot.
Burning the American flag as a demonstration of free speech is not a positive demonstration of free speech. In fact, it is just the opposite.
2 posted on
07/04/2006 3:34:49 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: RetroSexual
"It seemed like a good idea to burn some flags just because we can," added fellow organizer Sha Lar, 32, of Santa Cruz.What an a-hole.
Some at the celebration noted that in other countries, they could be shot for torching the national flag.
So why not burn THOSE flags, since that protest would mean something, as opposed to burning the flag of the country that ALLOWS such a display? If you're truly looking to make a statement about freedom, why not burn the flag of a country that doesn't allow it, here?
said he wanted to "reclaim the flag. Not only those who support President George W. Bush can wave the red white and blue."
Notice that liberals are the ones who always bring this up? Supporters of the President never say "we're the only ones who can wave the flag." But the liberal pursuit of the Victim Pose is never-ending.
To: RetroSexual
Burn in hell you anti-Americans!
4 posted on
07/04/2006 3:35:18 PM PDT by
HansGygi
To: RetroSexual
[The aptly named] Poison Oak, 35, of Aptos, said he wanted to "reclaim the flag. He wants to 'wave the flag' by burning it.
I don't know about this guy -- but generally speaking, in my opinion, only a drug addled America hating scumbag could ever conceive of such a notion.
7 posted on
07/04/2006 3:37:10 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: RetroSexual
Free speech? So I guess it's okay to burn the flags of France, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, and the PRC?
10 posted on
07/04/2006 3:42:10 PM PDT by
saveliberty
(Happy Independence Day!)
To: RetroSexual
It's not called Kalifornia with their dream of Amerika for nothing.
11 posted on
07/04/2006 3:43:53 PM PDT by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: RetroSexual
"Because we can". This is so childish.
12 posted on
07/04/2006 3:44:11 PM PDT by
llevrok
(The United States of America. , est. 1776)
To: RetroSexual
13 posted on
07/04/2006 3:48:41 PM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: RetroSexual
"It seemed like a good idea to burn some flags just because we can," Like the Constititutional right to get drunk and stupid and blather out any idiot thing.
Remember, free speech != smart speech (or even relevant speech)
15 posted on
07/04/2006 3:51:01 PM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(Yes, I used this same joke on Flag Day. So sue me. It's America.)
To: RetroSexual
Too bad noboy used their free speech to put a hose on their flags before they could burn them.
16 posted on
07/04/2006 3:55:14 PM PDT by
kitkat
(The first step down to hell is to deny the existence of evil.)
To: RetroSexual
Would it be 'insensitive' to burn one of these?
17 posted on
07/04/2006 3:56:51 PM PDT by
Libloather
(They can't privatize Social Security but they can find a way to give it to illegal aliens...)
To: RetroSexual
"Bastards."
That's what they want you to say. Every post to this thread is giving these mental midgets their jollies. "We're relevant!" they're thinking.
I'm sorry this article was printed--it's pure puffery--and I'm sorry it was posted. It will bring nothing but joy to these Rats.
18 posted on
07/04/2006 3:57:48 PM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
To: RetroSexual
"It seemed like a good idea to burn some flags just because we
can are f^#king morons," added fellow organizer Sha Lar, 32, of Santa Cruz.
There, I made a slight correction. BTW, Would it be a good idea for me to beat this little "Sha Lar" POS into a coma? I'm sure I can, so why not?
20 posted on
07/04/2006 4:03:04 PM PDT by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: RetroSexual
"It seemed like a good idea to burn some flags just because we can," added fellow organizer Sha Lar, 32, of Santa Cruz. Moron.
21 posted on
07/04/2006 4:05:30 PM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: RetroSexual
Getting folks riled up is their goal...it apparently works...
26 posted on
07/04/2006 4:19:55 PM PDT by
dakine
To: RetroSexual
If burning the flag is an exercise of free speech, can we consider such flag-burning as equivalent to the uttering of "fighting words" and beat the crap out of the flag burners? We would be performing an act of free speech ourselves, I should think.
Or could flag-burning be considered "hate speech" and therefore be subject to fine and imprisonment?
How about incitement to riot? Public burning without a permit?
To: RetroSexual
Backwards ass, California city f---s.
Ah, much more fitting saying now.
28 posted on
07/04/2006 4:28:13 PM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: RetroSexual
Barf alert! Those people make me sick!
To: RetroSexual
What would their reaction have been if some one showed up with U.N. flags to burn?
Notice this is Santa-Cruz, Kommifornia.
You know, the same insane bunghole that elects avowed communist as mayor, the community that happily accepted Angela Davis a regent at the local university.
32 posted on
07/04/2006 4:38:09 PM PDT by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: RetroSexual
"It seemed like a good idea to burn some flags just because we can," added fellow organizer Sha Lar, 32, of Santa Cruz. "It seems like a good idea to kick these turds in the teeth just because we can," added Freeper Triggerhippie, 38, of St. Augustine.
36 posted on
07/04/2006 4:47:08 PM PDT by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson