Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foam crack examined as NASA readies for launch (Launch on for 7/4)
CNN ^ | Monday, July 3, 2006 | Miles O'Brien, Kate Tobin, Marsha Walton and Jason Meucci

Posted on 07/03/2006 2:24:04 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Florida (CNN) -- Engineers on Monday are closely scrutinizing a small crack in insulation on space shuttle's fuel tank as NASA continues to prepare for a Tuesday launch.

NASA deputy manager John Shannon said foam that cracked covers a bracket that connects the liquid oxygen feedline to shuttle Discovery's external fuel tank.

When engineers went to inspect it, they pinched off a .0057-pound, 3- inch piece of foam.

Even so, Shannon said, had that piece fallen off during launch it wouldn't have damaged the orbiter.

The crack was discovered during an inspection Sunday evening, and is 4- to 5-inches- long and eighth- to a quarter-inch wide, NASA said. (Watch CNN's space expert explain when and why the crack could have appeared -- 1:27)

The Mission Management Team met Monday morning to go over possible scenarios -- including a possible fix.

Team members will meet again Monday evening to decide whether it must be fixed and whether the shuttle can launch Tuesday at 2:38 p.m. ET.

"We're going to meet back again at 6:30 p.m. ET tonight and summarize where we are with the analysis, summarize where we are with the inspection, try and and clear all our concerns and go launch tomorrow," Shannon said.

NASA has until July 19 to attempt a launch.

If a repair is needed, NASA would have to build a platform that would reach out to the bracket, which would allow engineers to make the fix, according to NASA spokesman Bruce Buckingham.

That would take more than a day, and delay Tuesday's launch.

But Buckingham says there's no fear the July 19 window would be in jeopardy.

There are two concerns with the cracked foam -- it could fall off during launch, and the piece is close to the belly of the orbiter.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: algoresfoam; discovery; foam; fourthofjuly; july4; nasa; shuttle; shuttlediscovery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2006 2:24:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The crack covers a bracket that connects the liquid oxygen feedline to Discovery's external fuel tank.

2 posted on 07/03/2006 2:24:53 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

When engineers went to inspect the crack, they pinched off a .0057-pound, 3- inch piece of foam.

3 posted on 07/03/2006 2:25:38 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Absolutely beautiful afternoon here today...would have been perfect.


4 posted on 07/03/2006 2:26:21 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican; Admin Moderator

In actuality, the decision to fly/not fly tomorrow will be AFTER the 6:30PM EDT meeting of the Mission Management Team. FOR NOW, the launch is still on, but this may change.


5 posted on 07/03/2006 2:34:46 PM PDT by hoagy62 (America: SUPREME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
In actuality, the decision to fly/not fly tomorrow will be AFTER the 6:30PM EDT meeting of the Mission Management Team. FOR NOW, the launch is still on, but this may change.

NASA sure can't make up their own mind.

6 posted on 07/03/2006 2:36:02 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Tell me about it. Everyone's got such a "CYA" mentality that it's no wonder nothing gets done around there!

I tell you, even though I love what NASA does, space exploration HAS to be put in the hands of private enterprise so we can get the ball rolling ahead again!


7 posted on 07/03/2006 2:43:37 PM PDT by hoagy62 (America: SUPREME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Is this that EPA approved foam or is this the same good old foam from years gone by used on the tanks?

Wasn't there dammage during the last launch due to the EPA approved junk foam?

I think the head of the EPA and his family should be part of this mission if they believe their PC Enviro friendly stuff is so great.


8 posted on 07/03/2006 2:46:21 PM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

In the olden days test flights of experimental aircraft were conducted at dawn when the wind was light and weather best. Is there a reason they need to launch in the afternoon? Is it so they reach the Space Station at the right moment?


9 posted on 07/03/2006 2:47:52 PM PDT by oxcart (Journalism [Sic])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

A piece of duct tape will take care of that pesky little crack!


10 posted on 07/03/2006 2:48:57 PM PDT by Knute (W- Yep, He's STILL the President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce
Wasn't there dammage during the last launch due to the EPA approved junk foam?

No. This comment appears on almost all Shuttle threads. The foam that was on the bipod mount (from which foam shedding impacted the wing), had a EPA waiver and was of the old design.

11 posted on 07/03/2006 2:58:35 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce
Actually, now that I have read your comment again, I think you were referring to the Discovery launch last year. I can't tell you the answer to that. I do know that the CAIB report noted that 80% of shuttle flights observed had shed foam, and 10% had shed foam from the bipod mount. This occurred throughout 2 separate changes in foam design (one of which was for the EPA regulations, of which certain areas got waivers).
12 posted on 07/03/2006 3:01:09 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
NASA deputy manager John Shannon

John should now be aboard the shuttle when it launches!

13 posted on 07/03/2006 3:02:42 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Off topic question - Why the July 19th deadline? What happens then?
14 posted on 07/03/2006 3:04:56 PM PDT by AVNevis (www.cahsconservative.blogspot.com Great Political Discussion from the eyes of a High School Student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oxcart
In the olden days test flights of experimental aircraft were conducted at dawn when the wind was light and weather best. Is there a reason they need to launch in the afternoon? Is it so they reach the Space Station at the right moment?

Yes. They are trying to hit a moving target.

15 posted on 07/03/2006 3:06:41 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis
Why the July 19th deadline?

The shuttle has to launch during the day for this second test flight. That is so that the cameras on the ground and in the air can observe if the corrections to the foam have been successful. I think that's the reason.

16 posted on 07/03/2006 3:09:13 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

There are orbital constraints.


17 posted on 07/03/2006 3:10:08 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

Alot of the launch timing constraints have to do with the lighting conditions available for tank photography, as well as the before mentioned orbital constraints.


18 posted on 07/03/2006 3:12:36 PM PDT by cabojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oxcart; AVNevis

The shuttle has to launch at the moment that the launch pad is in the plane of the orbit of the space station (imagine slicing the Earth in half along the path the ISS takes) because the ISS will be a rescue craft if the Discovery is damaged.

As well, after Columbia, two new guidelines were set: The shuttle must launch in daylight, and the the external tank needs to be examined in daylight after it is dropped, 8 minutes into the launch.

For this reason, the window for launch is only about 10 minutes long, and after July 19, the right time to launch, as determined by the ISS, would fall at the wrong time for the other requirements.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts121/fdf/sts121windows.html


19 posted on 07/03/2006 3:12:42 PM PDT by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: burzum; MaDuce

Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA Regs

As recently as last month, NASA had been warned that foam insulation on the space shuttle's external fuel tank could sheer off as it did in the 2003 Columbia disaster - a problem that has plagued space shuttle flights since NASA switched to a non-Freon-based type of foam insulation to comply with Clinton administration Environmental Protection Agency regulations.

Source: Newsmax

20 posted on 07/03/2006 3:18:30 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson