Skip to comments.
Airbus begins installation of A380 wing reinforcements
flightglobal.com ^
| July 4, 2006
| Max Kingsley-Jones
Posted on 07/03/2006 10:00:54 AM PDT by smonk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: smonk
The "reinforcements".
21
posted on
07/03/2006 10:32:48 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
To: lmailbvmbipfwedu
IMHO, we just don't understand the structural properties of composites well enough to try to use them in aircraft of this size and weight.
I also don't believe we understand how these materials degrade as they age, since they are so new.
I wouldn't want to fly on this aircraft, with wiring problems, fly by wire, and composite construction.
22
posted on
07/03/2006 10:33:52 AM PDT
by
EEDUDE
(Don't measure your wealth in dollars and cents.)
To: TommyDale
Grrr... You only beat me by 29+ minutes :o(
23
posted on
07/03/2006 10:33:57 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
To: Banjoguy
"I think it is turning out to be an engineering quagmire"
Hey, I thought "quagmire" was only reserved for Iraq?
What you doin' using that word for the mighty Euro-socialist project that shows the superiority of Europeans over those naive Americans? :)
24
posted on
07/03/2006 10:36:28 AM PDT
by
Jameison
To: smonk
They need to check that center fuel tank thingy while they're at it......and glue the tail on tighter.
25
posted on
07/03/2006 10:36:52 AM PDT
by
exit82
(If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
To: smonk
ScareBus is more like it.
To: EEDUDE
Hear, hear. Witness the Airbus that lost its vertical stab during takeoff and crashed around New York a few years ago.
To: LIConFem
LOL! I have always linked "AirBus" to duct tape. It's an automatic laugh.
28
posted on
07/03/2006 10:38:33 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Stop the Nifongery!)
To: TommyDale
I've always linked AirBus to lawn darts, myself :o)
29
posted on
07/03/2006 10:39:42 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
To: smonk
Wings fall off and critical wiring is bad - boy those europeans really know how to build a plane. You won't see me on one.
30
posted on
07/03/2006 10:46:17 AM PDT
by
Humvee
(Beliefs are more powerful than facts - Paulus Atreides)
To: dalereed
are they even designed to make a profit? It seems they will only make money with parts repairs.
Which is scarry considering there is then an incentive to make parts that wear out sooner than later. (and the contrary effort the the "budget minded" airline to extend partlife beyond recomendations)
31
posted on
07/03/2006 10:51:51 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: USNBandit
I saw a piece on the the DC10. Apparently, the hardware for an outer cargo hold door would warp when trying to seal
the door if it wasn't really secured, sending a false signal that the door wasn't a jar.
So, the plane might depressurized suddenly, collapsing the passenger floor...
The end of it was once the hardware was replaced, (automatic vents for the floor, too) it was too late for the
passenger days of the DC10.
They are now an efficient cargo transporter, though.
To: smonk
"...suffered a premature rupture during its ultimate load test..."
Scary mental image, isn't it?
To: americanstrategist
Another Concorde-type loser, except on a grander scale?
To: Humvee
meh, how important is it for the wings to stay on when the emergency escape chutes work so well?
Sweet irony
35
posted on
07/03/2006 11:19:21 AM PDT
by
smonk
To: EEDUDE
I can still remember the response to a suggestion we incorporate "plastics" into high end Hard Disk Drives in the 70's...
"Plastics are not a sufficiently understood engineering material"....
Semper Fi
36
posted on
07/03/2006 11:25:49 AM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: smonk
This plane is still in the Beta stage.
37
posted on
07/03/2006 11:46:13 AM PDT
by
Socratic
("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
To: smonk
Airbus A380: The BIG PIG Hopefully the additions will make it so heavy they won't be able to "cram" more than 400 people into it. (I know, the additions aren't likely to weigh 30 tons.)
38
posted on
07/03/2006 11:47:41 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
To: Jameison
I dunno...wasn't thinking straight I guess.
39
posted on
07/03/2006 12:06:35 PM PDT
by
Banjoguy
(I refuse to 'Google' anything at anytime.)
To: Banjoguy
(I think it is turning out to be an engineering quagmire)
I think they should pull out of there, or as Murtha would say, reverse direction!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson