Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aerial image of battleship Yamato discovered
NHK Online ^ | 03 Jul 06 | Unkn

Posted on 07/03/2006 8:42:25 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY

A Japanese museum has obtained a rare photo of Japan's World War Two battleship the Yamato shortly before it departed for the East China Sea, where it was sunk by US warplanes.

The aerial photo was taken by a US reconnaissance plane on April 6, 1945, off Tokuyama in Yamaguchi prefecture, western Japan, five hours before the Yamato made its final sortie.

The Yamato Museum in Kure City, Hiroshima Prefecture, recently obtained a digital image of this photo, which is stored in the US National Archives in Washington.

The Yamato, the world's largest-ever battleship, sank on its way to Okinawa after being attacked by US naval aircraft on April 7, 1945.

The image shows the Yamato preparing for departure, and six other escort vessels, including the light cruiser Yahagi, which were anchored around the Yamato.

The Yamato was remodeled several times to counter US air attacks. A researcher says the picture is the first photo that clearly shows anti-aircraft guns installed near the Yamato's stern.

The Yamato Museum Director, Kazushige Todaka, says the photo is important since there is a lack of data on the battleship shortly before it sank.


TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battleship; battleshipyamato; navy; okinawa; pacific; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-260 next last
To: Tallguy
The Shinano was a lousy aircraft carrier. Being build on a BB-hull she had little hangar space or aviation-fuel bunkerage for aircraft below deck compared to a purpose-built CV. If memory serves she could only handle about 1/3rd the air wing component of an Essex-class carrier.

Well, the Shinano was really designed as an aircraft transport to ferry replacements to the fleet carriers. Her own air wing was fairly small. But given the fact that the Japanese needed carriers and needed them desperately, she wasn't a bad idea at the time.

141 posted on 07/03/2006 12:29:38 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
I believe the ships name was FUSO. Yamashiro also took a torpedo hit but continued on into the trap laid at Surigao Strait where she was pummeled by more destroyer torpedoes as well as gunfire from the Battleships that were resurrected from Pearl Harbor, they finally got their revenge that night!!!!

Historians are pretty sure it was Fuso that was knocked before the battleships engaged and Yamashiro was the one blown out of the water by the U.S. BB's.

It was the last time in history when battleship faced battleship.

142 posted on 07/03/2006 12:31:50 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
We never got to find out, because she hadn't reached combat readiness when Archerfish found her.
143 posted on 07/03/2006 12:32:07 PM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Gator101
Actually the slow battleships were guarding Surigao strait down south which they did to great effect, sinking two Japanese BB's. Some of the old Pearl Harbor battleships got a little payback for Dec 7th.

Yep. You're right, and thanks for the correction. It was SURIGAO that was the BB action. San Bernadino was the running battle with the Tin Cans & Baby Flattops.

I've never read a convincing reason as to why the Japanese admiral at San Benadino failed to press the attack. Any fair reading of his orders should have made it clear that his force to be sacrificed if necessary. The entire plan was to tie up as many US Fleet assets as possible in the hopes that 1 of 3 prongs would get a shot at the Leyte beaches. To me that's basically a Kamikaze mission with ships.

144 posted on 07/03/2006 12:32:15 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
Yep...that was her. I believe she might have been the only battleship sunk in WW2 with no survivors, only because any sailor who made it to shore was killed by the Filipinos.
145 posted on 07/03/2006 12:33:25 PM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Gator101

I went to a reunion of the Taylor (my dad's ship in WWII) in 2004. There were six Pearl Harbor survivors there.


146 posted on 07/03/2006 12:34:13 PM PDT by Aeronaut ("Endless repetition is not a coherent argument." —Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
We never got to find out, because she hadn't reached combat readiness when Archerfish found her.

IIRC, the Shinano was being shuttled to another navy yard to be fitted out, and the crew of the Archerfish were stunned that she went down so quickly. Some indication that her watertight compartments were not.

147 posted on 07/03/2006 12:37:00 PM PDT by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

It was nice to see that the Old Girls (U.S.S. West Virginia, U.S.S. Tennessee, U.S.S. Maryland, U.S.S. California among others that were damaged severely at Pearl Harbor)got their revenge that night.


148 posted on 07/03/2006 12:40:33 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: stacytec
I'm firing my Magna-flame gun now.
149 posted on 07/03/2006 12:41:19 PM PDT by MrEdd (Bad spellers of the world - UNTIE!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

We'll be in Hawaii on the 29th. Pearl Harbor will be first on our list


150 posted on 07/03/2006 12:41:31 PM PDT by wordsofearnest (Bring Back Torre (There's new grass on the field))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I was very familiar w/ LPD 1 - USS Raleigh


151 posted on 07/03/2006 12:41:50 PM PDT by 70times7 (An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
I have wondered that as well. If ever one of those overly complicated Japanese strategies managed to pay off...the sneak through San Bernadino Strait was it! Halsey fell for the decoy - hook, line, and sinker.

Some theories say that Kurita couldn't believe the amount of resistance that such a small force was giving him. Little destroyers were charging into the guns of battleships and every thing that could fly was going after his ships, even after they ran out of ammo, if only to fake a torpedo or strafing run and make somebody flinch. Maybe he was worried about what would happen when the big boys showed up? Still, it was a surprising move for a people who embraced suicide before dishonor to run like this. I doubt the men under Kurita were too happy with his decision.
152 posted on 07/03/2006 12:54:01 PM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
It's about time the San Antonio was recognized.

SA (Texas) is top ten city (population) but had never been given a ship name: USS Alamo was closest. But Phoenix, Albuquerque, Denver, and hundreds of other cities got chosen.

Many cities have been recognized multiple times: Boston is the most frequent I can recall with 6 ships named after her.
153 posted on 07/03/2006 12:54:04 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Defender2

bookmark


154 posted on 07/03/2006 12:57:54 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

:-)
Happy Fourth!!!!:-)


155 posted on 07/03/2006 1:03:53 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Egon; CJ Wolf

Memories of running home after school to watch Star Blazers... What a great show. Thanks for throwing that into the mix.


156 posted on 07/03/2006 1:04:19 PM PDT by roostercashews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH
From WWII on, even ONE hit on a DD (or FF) sized ship has taken out that ship: After just one hit, EVERY destroyer (which are now cruiser-sized: CG-47 etc are on essentially Spruance hulls) has lost power, command & control, fire control, or propulsion.

Several that have been hit (even if the shell or missile doesn't explode) have sunk from secondary fires. Those that hit a mine or water-level blast have been lost for years of repair.

But EVERY one has lost the ability to keep fighting after only one hit. The list includes some 40-odd destroyers: only a few such as Sheffield, Stark, Cole are well known.

We had two DDG's off of Vietnam that got hit shrapnel from near-misses that lost their radar for example. No radar = no fight back.
157 posted on 07/03/2006 1:08:07 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
I think you do recall correctly. The book Shinano! by Joseph Enright is a good read.
158 posted on 07/03/2006 1:08:17 PM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I suggest for your reading, please read about San Bernadino Strait ad the Destroyers of Taffy 3.


159 posted on 07/03/2006 1:10:41 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Also another impresive destroyer action in the Barents involving UK dstroyers versus Scharnhorst and Gneisanau.


160 posted on 07/03/2006 1:12:54 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson