Posted on 07/02/2006 11:58:45 AM PDT by Coastal
What motivates the New York Times to publish information that helps the enemy kill Americans? It is the central question because, in the final analysis, Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and his editors and reporters are Americans, too. This is a paper based in a city that lost almost 3,000 citizens on 9/11.
The next time the terrorists strike, the Times and its employees could be incinerated. The next time we are hit by al Qaeda, Times employees could be jumping out of windows to their deaths. But the paper decided that it’s better to risk another terrorist attack on America than withhold information that might help prevent another attack. What accounts for such a strange view about the value of human life? Why has this paper turned its back on the absolute necessity of protecting the lives of our fellow Americans?
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalledger.com ...
;*)
bttt
Good article. Thanks.
Just A Nobody wrote:
That is why AIM is joining with Kristinn Taylor and members of www.freerepublic.com at a demonstration outside of the Times Washington, D.C. bureau on July 3.
Very nice, FReepers taking charge!
"The New York Times" is not some monolithic faceless alien oracle.
It is run by this man Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and his cadre of socialist crook propagandists from NYC's 42nd st.
Sulzberger is an enemy of the state and should be surveilled and brought up on charges of sedition. bttt
Where does this Sulzberger person live on the weekends?
The NYTs does what it does because there's a huge culture war going on. The biggest since the Wets and the Drys in the nineteen teens and twenties.
The Times is on the side of feminizing America, making it more like Europe. They favor homosexual "rights" which means quotas for gays; black "affirmative action" which means quotas for minorities, and nazi-feminist control over the culture.
They want an end to Christianity as its practiced today: more "hate" speech laws, and they want conservative speech outlawed and Hillary in the White House.
This is a war.
"What motivates the New York Times to publish information that helps the enemy kill Americans?"
They are motivated to defend against what they perceive as a major political defeat for Democrats that will follow a Bush military victory in Iraq. If Bush wins, they lose. There’s nothing more to it. The only war that matters in the eyes of most Democrat leaders and their media allies is the political conflict between Left and Right.
Protest the New York Times Revealing of U.S. Secrets, Monday, July 10, 5 p.m.
"If Bush wins, they lose..."
Exactly - and they are willing to do anything to try and make sure 'Bush (and America) lose.'
I don't know. But what's that old saying about "what's good for the goose is good for the gander"?
N.Y. Times Retaliates Against Cheney, Rumsfeld
newsmax ^ http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/30/151423.shtml?s=ic
Posted on 06/30/2006 3:46:42 PM EDT by edzo4
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1658602/posts
Friday, June 30, 2006 2:59 p.m. EDT N.Y. Times Retaliates Against Cheney, Rumsfeld
Beware of travel feature stories posing as invitations to terror.
"The New York Times points cranks, radicals, al-Qaida operatives and would-be assassins to the summer homes of [V.P. Dick] Cheney and [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld" writes FrontPage Magazine's David Horowitz, who sees the June 30 Times feature article as an apparent retaliation for administration "criticism of the Times' disclosure of classified intelligence to America's enemies."
In the "Escapes" section of the June 30 edition, the N.Y. Times printed huge color photos of the vacation residences of Cheney and Rumsfeld, "identifying the small Maryland town where they live, showing their front driveways and, in Rumsfeld's case, actually pointing out the hidden security camera in case any hostile intruders should get careless," Horowitz writes.
Times Travel section writer Peter Kilborn even makes sure enemies of the two men will know such details as where Mrs. Rumsfeld shops in the eastern shore town of St. Michaels, Md. where the two administration officials have weekend retreats.
He even lets the curious know what street the Cheneys and Rumsfelds have to use to get to their own road.
It's all part of the war against President Bush, Horowitz charges.
"Make no mistake about it, there is a war going on in this country," Horowitz advises, noting that the aggressors in this war "are Democrats, liberals and leftists who began a scorched earth campaign against President Bush before the initiation of hostilities in Iraq."
One of the most prevalent weapons in this war, according to Horowitz, is the New York Times.
NYT Published when it did to beat the LA paper, why is the LA paper getting off so easy?
I figured it was. bttt
uh, 43rd st...
??
It is run by this man Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and his cadre of socialist crook propagandists from NYC's 42nd st.
They haven't moved into the new building yet. They are on 43rd street.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.