Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Underground Economy
Barron's (cover story -The Wall Street Journal Classr0oom Edition) ^ | April 2005 | Jim McTague

Posted on 07/01/2006 6:07:10 PM PDT by pigdog

Illegal Immigrants and Others Working Off the Books Cost the U.S. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Unpaid Taxes

America has two economies: First, there's the legitimate economy, in which craftsmen are licensed and employers and employees pay taxes. Then there's the fast-growing underground economy, where millions of nannies, construction workers, landscapers and others are paid off the books, their incomes largely untaxed. The best guess as to the size of the output of this shadow economy is about $970 billion, or nearly 9% that of the real economy. It could soon pass $1 trillion.

What is largely fueling the underground economy, experts say, is the nation's growing ranks of low-wage, illegal immigrants. The government puts this population at 8.5 million, but that may represent a serious undercount. Robert Justich, a senior managing director at Bear Stearns Asset Management, makes a persuasive case in a recent research report that illegal immigrants actually number 18 million to 20 million. If that's true, the economic implications are profound and could help shape this year's debates over both immigration policies and tax reform.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsjclassroom.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aliens; fraudtax; illegalaliens; immigration; scam; taxes; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
To: Principled
Getting all these illegals to pay tax will help reduce the burden on the rest of us.

The only thing which will reduce the tax burden is a reduction in how much the Government spends. Anything else is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Unless and until some of the extraneous programs, earmarks, and waste are removed from the public tab, regardless of HOW we pay it, we all pay too much.

Making the means of collection seem more palatable does nothing to address the fact that our government pisses away more than the GDP of many countries every year. Until you plug the bucket, it does not matter what kind of pump you try to fill it with, it is still running out on the ground.

Instead of figuring out how to make money off of the illegals here, how about securing the border and giving them the boot?

That would cure a lot of the 'need' to try and tax them, which is the ticket to having them 'pay their fair share' which means that problem will never be fixed.

41 posted on 07/01/2006 7:51:35 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Seems to me that this person would pay little or no net nrst too.

Do they get a don't tax me card to flash or do they get to try to pry it back from the gov?

42 posted on 07/01/2006 7:52:58 PM PDT by Dosa26 (p-q4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Another great idea that will be ignored by the Politicians.


43 posted on 07/01/2006 7:55:08 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

As I've shown several times before, on a $100 sale the income tax resulting would be something like $3.75 - and most of that would not be from embedded taxes but normal income tax. With the FairTax the tax realized would be $23 rather than $3.75.


44 posted on 07/01/2006 7:57:01 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Any new taxes always end up being "in addition to" the existing tax structure, never "in place of". Even if one tax is lowered to "make room" for a "new, improved tax" which is guaranteed and promised to stay at a low rate...it always ends up ballooning upward, then out of control. Original promises are long forgotten.

In other words, I'm against the Fair Tax proposal. Government even taxes my TV set by setting in place new broadcast laws that force me to buy a new TV set, soon making my old set obsolete.

45 posted on 07/01/2006 7:58:06 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Leaning on the everlasting arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

The requirements are in the bill as you know - and most illegals don't qualify.

But then, you already knew that.


46 posted on 07/01/2006 7:58:36 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
The only thing which will reduce the tax burden is a reduction in how much the Government spends. Anything else is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

I respectfully disagree.

As an example of why, consider the act of eliminating withholding income and payroll taxes - instead, make people pay monthly by check like most other bills.

Although changing the method of collection would not explicitly change the amount to be collected, it would put massive downward pressure on taxes and hence spending.

I say this to offer an alternative POV.

The method of collection has a LOT to do with spending.

That said, consider the decades long, unbounded expansion of government spending. It's all happened on our watch - and a repub house, senate, and executive hasn't helped one iota.

Just working on cutting spending hasn't helped - in fact IMO focusing on spending to the exclusion of anything else has been a major contributor to the continued unbounded growth of government.

How you collect the taxes does matter. Discounting an alternative for failing to cut spending simultaneously is a poor decision IMO.

47 posted on 07/01/2006 8:01:17 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26
In fact, the 2 groups you mention will be greatly helped by the FairTax. You need to do some research to inform yourself by spending some "quality time" on theFairTax website.

There's lots of helpful information there on many, many different topics. Check the FAQs and Rebuttals for example.

48 posted on 07/01/2006 8:03:39 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I don't think anyone can argue with your point that the real effort to set the government's finances in order must be centered upon spending. You cannot possibly be wrong about that.

But I ask you to consider the universe of interests that figure into the development of both appropriations and tax exemptions, and tax exemptions (unlike tax cuts) are spending. There is a federal bureaucracy that consists of an entire constellation of departments, bureaus, administrations, offices, and more that is directly vested in either maintaining the current tax code or in expanding its complexity to advance the interests their particular office is there to support. A national retail sales tax will not eliminate their influence upon the budgetary process, but it will drastically curtail their ability to manipulate fiscal policy through the tax code.

To sum all of this up Smokin' Joe, I am arguing that the playing field within which spending can properly be addressed must be one in which appropriations are considered openly in their own right, rather than being hidden from view through the device of tax exemptions manipulated by an overweening federal bureaucracy. It is only one small step in a larger process of curtailing spending, it by no means solves the problem.

And I ask you to consider that my real appraisal of just how out of control spending really is can best be understood by the fact that I argue that the most drastic overhaul of tax policy in a century will only be a small step towards achieving that control of spending we all desire.
49 posted on 07/01/2006 8:04:08 PM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

And in the overall picture with reference to taxes, that means what???


50 posted on 07/01/2006 8:07:18 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Principled

In fact, with the prebate some of them may actually have a negative tax rate.


51 posted on 07/01/2006 8:09:02 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26
Do they get a don't tax me card to flash or do they get to try to pry it back from the gov?

I see.

HR 25 (enter "hr 25") has as a provision that only discretionary spending on new items for retail consumption will be taxed.

Another way to think of it is that necessity-level spending is not taxed - similar to today's standard deduction/exemptions.

The way it works is that nobody, who is a legal resident with a valid SSN, pays tax on necessities. It is this aspect of the bill that ensures that illegals will pay tax at an effective rate higher than legal residents - and was the topic of the lead-in article.

This is accomplished by sending families a check/electronic tansfer each month, in advance in an amount that will cover the taxes they'll have to pay at the register. Some people call it a rebate, others call it a prebate.

52 posted on 07/01/2006 8:09:13 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
And in the overall picture with reference to taxes, that means what???

No taxes. That was my point. Is he supposed to fill out 100 IRS forms? I wouldn't. Ever.

53 posted on 07/01/2006 8:15:27 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
All of the FairTax supporters I know are very much in favor of large spending cuts. It's pointless to try that (since it hasn't worked in almost 100 years now with the income tax) until we first get the taxing mechanism under control where the politicians cannot boost taxes and hide them from taxpayers as they not do using many, many different techniques.

With the FairTax, the tax burden is visible to all and the same for all and the taxpayers then can have more control over ho much goes to the government - and when.

With the FairTax a good many of the illegals will do a self-deporting since it will cost them far more in taxes than they could ever dream about - thinking ole' Uncle Sugar was good for any scam they could dream up.

54 posted on 07/01/2006 8:16:13 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

"The IRS last year added 2,200 enforcement employees."

Well they definitely have the IRS agents to enforce it....even though the borders are still open and illegals run rampant in our country.

Guess making sure they collect those taxes from American citizens is more important to them.


55 posted on 07/01/2006 8:16:56 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
In fact, with the prebate some of them may actually have a negative tax rate.

While possible, IMO it's unlikely for many people at all to consistently have a negative rate. Folks could deny the necessities of life, sure ... but would they?

Folks could grow their own food ... some will but not many.

There just aren't very many groups at all who fail to spend up to the poverty level.

You've seen this BLS DATA.

56 posted on 07/01/2006 8:17:39 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26

Neither - if they meet the qualifications stated in HR25, then can register with the SSA for the monthly prebate which is a refund of tax money up to the poverty level.


57 posted on 07/01/2006 8:17:55 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Those aren't "original promises" - they're in the HR25 bill which will be the tax law when it passes.

If you'd trouble to read a few pages of the bill or the FairTax website, you'd soon find out that the income tax and it appurtenances (the IRS) are gonzo along with the income tax records and the funding for the IRS. How much deader do you think it can be?
58 posted on 07/01/2006 8:21:21 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

One can make the rules so complicated that one can rule out a lot of good posting.


59 posted on 07/01/2006 8:23:17 PM PDT by groanup (Shred For Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Well now we all know what balrog looks like on the toilet. Would balrog like to favor us with his solution to the bastard income tax?


60 posted on 07/01/2006 8:26:04 PM PDT by groanup (Shred For Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson