Skip to comments.
Iranian drone plane buzzes U.S. aircraft carrier in Persian Gulf (Russian Source)
Ria Novosti/India Defence ^
Posted on 06/30/2006 7:46:33 AM PDT by Srirangan
Tehran: A pilotless Iranian reconnaissance plane circled for 25 minutes over a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf before returning safely to its base, a senior Iranian official said Tuesday.
"Our pilotless reconnaissance plane flew over the USS Ronald Reagan in the Persian Gulf unnoticed to the Americans for 25 minutes," the official said, according to Iran's Fars agency.
He did not say when the flight took place, but added that U.S. radars picked up the unmanned aerial vehicle after 25 minutes, and that four USAF fighters and two helicopters were scrambled to intercept it. However, the Iranian plane had already crossed the border back into Iran and landed at its base.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; proliferation; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: F15Eagle
Given their brotherhood's prediliction for unprovoked jihad attacks, it wouldn't surprise me that they'd wire some Semtex and a radio-remote detonator and try to dive the thing into some parked aircraft on the deck of a U.S. carrier and try to set off the fuel tanks. I'm quite certain that the slightest indication of hostile intent by the drone would result in its immediate demise. If it really did get anywhere near the carrier, that happened only because we allowed it to happen. (I'm also quite sure that we were monitoring and recording every electronic transmission to and from the drone to analyze its capabilities.)
61
posted on
06/30/2006 10:42:45 AM PDT
by
Bob
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: F15Eagle
We definitely got to be on our toes with these clowns. Agreed. But, then again, especially since the Cole attack, I'm very sure that we are. (That carrier skipper who somehow let a small boat get too close in the gulf last year provided a serious lesson for other commanding officers. I have to wonder what his next command was.)
63
posted on
06/30/2006 12:28:17 PM PDT
by
Bob
Comment #64 Removed by Moderator
To: TheGunny
Must be the newly integrated navy. (sarc). You and I both know USAF weenie pilots don't have the brass required to operate from a carrier.
65
posted on
06/30/2006 12:36:35 PM PDT
by
retiredcpo
(2 johns - flushed)
To: F15Eagle
The incident I was referring to occurred out in the Persian Gulf in open waters. IIRC, there was actually a collision between one of our carriers (sorry, I forget which one) and a small boat (a dhow?) -- a very dangerous situation that never should have been allowed to happen.
BTW, I liked the article saying that USAF jets tried to intercept the drone. Those launches and carrier landings must be a bear for those Air Force guys. :=)
66
posted on
06/30/2006 12:45:55 PM PDT
by
Bob
To: NFOShekky
Thank you for your service!!!
67
posted on
06/30/2006 12:48:41 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Mohhamed drank urine from female pigs.)
To: Bob
"Agreed. But, then again, especially since the Cole attack, I'm very sure that we are. (That carrier skipper who somehow let a small boat get too close in the gulf last year provided a serious lesson for other commanding officers. I have to wonder what his next command was.)Don't forget that the Clintoon civillians told the military to keep security on deck to a minimu, so as not to inflame Yemen pissholes while in port.
Normal security in port in a hostile port was not imiplemented, on orders from the feel-good-world-peace-pansy-police. Then they blamed it on the skipper.
68
posted on
06/30/2006 1:06:06 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Mohhamed drank urine from female pigs.)
To: Joe Boucher
You're one of those sleeper-freeper celss that just activated, right Murtha?
69
posted on
06/30/2006 1:07:20 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Mohhamed drank urine from female pigs.)
Comment #70 Removed by Moderator
To: Tulsa Ramjet
He, He, He, I had one of those drones when I was a child - it came with a two-winged airport and helicopter with pad that was manual crank for liftoff. None of the airport passengers had arms???. Thank you for the memory.
71
posted on
06/30/2006 2:24:36 PM PDT
by
Harrius Magnus
(Seared in my mind: Is Is.)
To: retiredcpo
USAF Carrier
72
posted on
06/30/2006 3:14:58 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(3.03)
To: Joe Boucher
Lil Joe a g.d rubber boat almost sunk the Cole
73
posted on
06/30/2006 8:53:54 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Dick Trickle is not a medical condition)
To: edcoil
a drone is not an aircraft.
74
posted on
11/12/2006 11:00:40 AM PST
by
omega4179
(Stop McCain/Giuliani 08)
To: b4its2late
75
posted on
11/12/2006 11:11:11 AM PST
by
tillacum
To: Pox
The Iranians have released the video footage taken by the UAV. Iranian maritime patrol aircraft also conduct visual observations of Coalition naval forces in the Gulf.
76
posted on
12/29/2006 8:00:26 AM PST
by
Tommyjo
To: Tommyjo
Tomorrow is the 30th, so you're a day early. LOL
Talk about a necro thread. Let's see a link to the video please. Our carrier patrols will only let other aircraft within a certain distance, and the claim by those who put out this 'bulletin' this past summer had nothing to offer in the way of video, and I've not heard of it to date until your post.
77
posted on
12/29/2006 9:22:12 AM PST
by
Pox
(If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
To: Pox
Link to the UAV footage of a Nimitz Class:
Link
Iranian maritime patrol aircraft also conduct visuals on Coalition Naval forces. As long as the UAV keeps out of the flight pattern it is free to monitor such shipping in international waters.
78
posted on
12/29/2006 12:58:09 PM PST
by
Tommyjo
To: Srirangan
Our pilotless reconnaissance plane flew over the USS Ronald Reagan in the Persian Gulf unnoticed to the Americans for 25 minutes.
79
posted on
12/29/2006 1:01:36 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I just want to be loved from the bellybutton down. Is that so wrong?)
To: Tommyjo
Interesting video, but it is certainly not able to be credibly certified as 'authentic'. It seems more likely that it is a video that was acquired by Iran and presented as originating from an Iranian drone. I doubt it.
However, for the sake of argument, let's say it is 'authentic'. It would then follow that the U.S. carrier group likely felt it was no threat and ignored it. precisely what use is it other than propaganda? Does anyone actually believe that Iran would have a chance in hell of surviving an armed conflict with the U.S.?
My primary interest in this thread is why you seem to think such drivel from the retards in Iran is 'significant' enough to resurrect a 6 month old thread.
80
posted on
12/29/2006 4:14:00 PM PST
by
Pox
(If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson