To: YaYa123
If this secret was already known, then just why was it "newsworthy?"
5 posted on
06/30/2006 4:33:40 AM PDT by
LOC1
To: LOC1
President Washington: "Before we executed Benedict Arnold, many traitors defended him,
by arguing that he did nothing of substance.
In truth, these traitors did thus declare that they, too, in truth, were -- also traitors.
American has never needed to hang these traitors more than today.
I would have hanged all of miserable these traitors if it was the last thing I could do on God's earth."
9 posted on
06/30/2006 4:38:51 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: LOC1
You win first prize Loc1, that is the big question.
They are telling us that the public has a right to know and then that the public already knew.
I assume that the terrorists were the only ones being informed since this is the case.
Traitors.
13 posted on
06/30/2006 6:18:07 AM PDT by
JerseyDvl
("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
To: LOC1
If this secret was already known, then just why was it "newsworthy?" And why was it still successful?
15 posted on
06/30/2006 6:21:22 AM PDT by
Schnucki
To: LOC1
NYT published this precisely to sell more newspapers. The editors are no different than any other traitor.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson