Replies

You seem to be saying that quotes from your fellow evolutionalists do NOT stand the test of time, which indicates to me that there are more than a few cracks in the foundation of that argument.

It is more than a matter of time, it is also a matter of context. However, "time" is an important factor, as information known now may not have been available at a previous time. It is not a weakness that a body of knowledge becomes better supported as more information accumulates over time. Further, the acquisition of knowledge does necessarily mean that a statement at one point in time regarding the state of evidence or information may well become out-of-place at a future time.

No matter what man is allowed, or blessed, to discover - even if he were to be able to unlock all of the mysteries of creation - he would find himself at the feet of God at the end of his journey, with the certain knowledge that God is Creator, and we are what we are by the grace of God.

You do not strengthen your argument by assuming your conclusion.

You don't strengthen your argument by trying to excuse the ignorance of the created when compared to the Word of the Omniscient Creator.

Btw, it isn't an assumption. Proof has to be proven by truth. The origin is laid out in the inspired Scriptures. It has not been proven wrong. God has said that man will be judged by the words contained in His inspired Word, and everything necessary for man to pass that test is provided and recorded from the beginning. There have been men who defied and rejected what He has told them from the beginning of time. Nothing has changed. Men still are trying to gather evidence with which to prove Him wrong, and with all of their "acquisition of knowledge", they are no closer now than then to doing so.

Even the Christ, the Son of God, bowed to the Will of God the Father in Heaven. He came to earth, and fulfilled the Father's Will. Who is man whom He created in His image that he should reject Him and call Him a liar?!