Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brain Food (Amazingthing about Godless is the amount of intellectual meat Ann Coulter has packed...)
The American Prowler ^ | 6/30/2006 | Richard Kirk

Posted on 06/30/2006 12:42:04 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-664 next last
To: balrog666

I believe Ann isn't smart enough to realize how stupid she is.


181 posted on 07/01/2006 4:08:16 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Your pastor doesn't know what ToE is or what a scientific theory is. I didn't bother to read his conclusions based on his false premises.

He knows what it is, he doesn't know you. You have a problem with him, take it up with him. And it is interesting that, though you "didn't bother to read his conclusions", you did bother to post me and tell me about it.

Do not bother me by posting a comment on something you didn't read.

182 posted on 07/01/2006 4:10:07 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The Rat Party's goal is to END the conflict, not WIN the conflict...should be the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

Yea, I understand. But why should something that doesn't matter in the whole theater of life be such a divisive issue?

I mean, I understand it matters to many people. But what would happen if, say, someday Jesus appears or some inarguable evidence comes to light proving creationism or evolution? So what? I guess the creationist or evolutionist would get to say Nah-Nah-Nah but other that that what's the point?


183 posted on 07/01/2006 4:19:39 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: ArGee

Can you not refute it? He makes a good argument. Is he right? Is he wrong? Why?


184 posted on 07/01/2006 4:21:00 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
I believe Ann isn't smart enough to realize how stupid she is.

Sadly, I too have come to a similar conclusion.

185 posted on 07/01/2006 4:37:29 PM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I read a certain Herman Hesse book once, maybe twice. Do I know about Buddha now?

If it told you why he didn't live immorally while not being a theist, then you learned something.

Immorality? What is that?

At a minimum, not living by the laws of the group, which is usually punishable by exile or death.

How can there be immorality in a jungle where only the "fittest" can or will survive?

It's the survival of the fittest species, not the fittest individual. And individualism doesn't always lead to survival of the species.

Do you not think humans have more of a reason to live over other species?

Are lions immoral for being predators of gazelles?

How could it possibly be immoral for a carnivore to feed?

186 posted on 07/01/2006 4:42:32 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert



Buddha taught a moral code that relied on logic, not God.


187 posted on 07/01/2006 4:46:22 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
Thanks so much. A heads up: my interview on Fox News may run on "Special Report With Brit Hume," on the 4th of July. It was originally slated for Memorial Day, but the CBS camera crew got killed that morning and it got bumped.

Also, Book-TV is filming my talk at the John Locke Foundation this Thurs. but I don't know when it will run.

188 posted on 07/01/2006 4:53:28 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I know I shouldn't but here goes.

"Even apes understand that that sort of behavior is a recipe for disaster. And humans have even more of an ability to use their minds to understand why short-term selfish gains are *not* worthwhile or desirable strategies in the long run. Instead, cooperation, mutual altruism, "golden rule" ethics, and so on are vastly more effective ways to enhance even your *own* net benefits in a society, as well as the welfare of others. It's a win-win situation."

So then why do many humans not do the right thing? Many, and sometimes I think most, humans don't understand that "short term selfish gains" are not worth it. But, I believe that what you posted should be the goal for everyone on earth. To me that is what the meaning of getting closer to God is. But for you to say that 'cause humans and apes might have these traits in common is yet more proof of evolution seems flawed. Actually it sounds like maybe apes evolved from humans.


189 posted on 07/01/2006 5:01:05 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Is that some sort of personal invective?

No, it was a response. I was still making the point that Ann was trying to accomplish something different than what he thought she was trying to argue.

Can you not argue the post? He makes a point.

Yes, but about a different subject. I'd like to see someone try to refute it, but if this is the best I'm going to get, I'll concede his point.

I'm sorry, but is that supposed to be a threat? I'm not performing nor am I engaging in a sport. I'm not going to worry about what points you cede or don't cede.

Shalom.

190 posted on 07/01/2006 5:34:50 PM PDT by ArGee (The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Well, we all knew that.


191 posted on 07/01/2006 5:35:03 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Islam - a dangerous cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Your morality is conditional?

I'm not sure of your point. In your opinion what is morality based upon?

Shalom.

192 posted on 07/01/2006 5:35:43 PM PDT by ArGee (The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Can you not refute it? He makes a good argument. Is he right? Is he wrong? Why?

I have no interest in reading all of it, let alone refuting it. Most of the time I discuss evolution I find that we can't agree on the basis of the discussion. Without that, there is no purpose in having the discussion. I am tired enough of that disconnect that I don't even join in the discussion anymore.

Shalom.

193 posted on 07/01/2006 5:37:36 PM PDT by ArGee (The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: saleman
But why should something that doesn't matter in the whole theater of life be such a divisive issue?

Good question. May come back to this later.

194 posted on 07/01/2006 5:38:39 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: LS

Congratulations on your successes. Too bad about the CBS camera crew. My guess: camera crews may be the better part of CBS.


195 posted on 07/01/2006 5:39:24 PM PDT by ChessExpert (Islam - a dangerous cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
If you believe you can articulate a persuasive basis for morality absent God, that would be a positive contribution. I would be interested in what you have to say.

The basis of biology and evolution is survival of the species. Anyone acting immoral threatens the species thus the members of the species would 'reinforce' to him that he was not acting in the interest of the species. From many such interactions over eons, a moral code would develope.

196 posted on 07/01/2006 5:41:32 PM PDT by OmahaFields ("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
My guess: camera crews may be the better part of CBS.

'specially those making sure their cameras were off while they technicians rigged the 'bombs' under the pickup truck.

197 posted on 07/01/2006 5:42:45 PM PDT by OmahaFields ("What have been its fruits? ... superstition, bigotry and persecution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: TomSmedley
You are not embarassed by the behavior of such consistent evolutionists as Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Sanger? You do not see the connections between their thoughts and their actions? You wish to hallow the thought behind the actions, while disavowing the consequences?

You are not embarassed by the behavior of such consistent Christians as Hitler, Jim Jones and Robert Byrd? You do not see the connections between their thoughts and their actions? You wish to hallow the thought behind the actions, while disavowing the consequences?

198 posted on 07/01/2006 5:44:44 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Let them die of thirst in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bobdsmith

...the tongue-in-cheek theme of liberalism being a religion.

&&&&&

Ann is deadly earnest about liberalism being a religion. Liberals believe in themselves and in government and in silencing any contrary perspective, because it is "wrong" or "insensitive." Their views prevail in government schools, to the exclusion of all others, and should be recognized to mean that they have established a "state religion" of a-theism.


199 posted on 07/01/2006 5:47:47 PM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
"Do you think God has a body, and that's what is referred to as "His image" in the Bible?"

When I was about 19 (maybe 20, I forget) years old, I apparently stunned the very young almost ordained catholic priest Jesuit of my acquaintance with a simple question.

I said or asked, if he thought an image is something that you see, or something that you look to.

Clearly we viewed the world through different prisms.

Later that day, month, year, whatever....

One of his disciples showed up on my TV. Channel 5, Boston.

He was whining about gay rights and other stuff like that. I never even knew that this particular fellow was a sodomite. I just knew him, and the on TV editorial thing sort of surprised me.

I never saw him again, and I suppose that he is dead now because of that incredibly discriminatory virus which attacks the T cells of it's victims.

T cells are your best friends until you introduce them to the HIV cells who are there because of bad behavior, or bad medical practices, or bad Karma. It is uglier than that actually.

Meanwhile, back at the rant, an image from here is something that you look to.

If you want to imply with sinister intent that God looks like somebody...well then welcome to my attitude toward stupid blow hards.

200 posted on 07/01/2006 5:53:27 PM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-664 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson