Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2006 11:23:54 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RWR8189

A preemptive strike by the comrades at the NYT! They're getting worse every day.


2 posted on 06/29/2006 11:25:37 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

kean junior is just like senior, big time RINO.
his last commercial was the tom kean show starring john mccain, say no more. unfortunately, in my neck of the woods, this is what we get.


3 posted on 06/30/2006 12:08:31 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

"We are going to fabricate from (near) whole cloth a 'grassroots' ad campaign, pre-announce it to NYT reporters, generally act like contestants in the upperclass twit of the year competition, and retreat into our country clubs and remorse on the heartening but ultimately unsuccessful campaign Tom's son entertained us with."


Brilliant!


5 posted on 06/30/2006 2:56:58 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Why is it 'Swift-boating' to attack a Democrat, but the Democrats can attack Bush and other Republicans without the 'Swift-boating' label ever being applied?


6 posted on 06/30/2006 3:02:48 AM PDT by Reform4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Although the premise and many elements of the Swift boat advertisements were strongly disputed, as a whole they were seen as successful in hobbling the Kerry campaign.

Note that "strongly disputed" is in no way a synonym for "false".

What is ironic is that the New York Times was whining at the time about how John F. Kerry was not disputing the Swift Boat Vets strongly enough!

Swift Boats are the new 'Rat Willie Horton, which is to say their universal label for anything effective done by the 'Pubbies. I would say that if the worthies at the New York Times are upset about this campaign, it must mean that Kean is on the right track.

Running against Menendez without talking about corruption would be like trying to film an episode of Baywatch without showing any bathing beauties. What would be the point?

7 posted on 06/30/2006 3:35:40 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson