Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XJarhead
Your analysis is spot on. It is not that the majority of the Justices, they did know it. But they did not want to obey it. So, they went into an elaborate and dishonest tap dance to "explain" why the law did not apply to them.

I agree with your summary. I just had to plow through 2,000 words of reporting to reach that conclusion.

John / Billybob
155 posted on 06/30/2006 3:24:47 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Your analysis is spot on. It is not that the majority of the Justices, they did know it. But they did not want to obey it. So, they went into an elaborate and dishonest tap dance to "explain" why the law did not apply to them. I agree with your summary. I just had to plow through 2,000 words of reporting to reach that conclusion.

The problem here was that Congress tried to get cute, and the Court called them on it.

The Democrats wanted a bill that would restrict the Court's jurisdiction only over future cases, not pending cases. The Republicans (or at least most of them) wanted to remove jurisdiction from all cases, including pending ones. What they wound up passing was a bill that had 3 separate jurisdiction-stripping provisions. Two of them explicitly said that they applied to all pending and future cases. The third (actually, it was the first)-- the one that applied to cases brought by Gitmo internees-- didn't say either way. Then both sides made floor speeches explaining how the bill supported what they wanted to do.

You are right to the extent that Scalia probably had the better of the argument that ambiguity in jurisdiction-stripping bills should be interpreted against continued jurisdiction. But the issue was not clear-cut, and that ambiguity is absolutely Congress's fault. So the majority was not being clearly lawless here.

157 posted on 06/30/2006 4:42:35 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
I wouldn't say they don't want to obey it. I'd say they don't know how to obey. They have lost touch with the fundamental ability of humans to respect a Higher Authority, which is essential to maintaining and preserving a free society.

They are Godless, and their church is the arena of public fashion. The propaganda of the main stream media is their scripture. They fancy that they are the Chief Opinion Decreers, and the main stream media allows them that delusion, so long as they remain obedient to the left's lies.

176 posted on 07/01/2006 10:58:06 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson