I was wondering, Mr. Moderator (and Diana and others): Does your "Free Republic" not allow free speech, including opposing views? There was nothing in my post (#36) that was defamatory or insulting. My only crime was to challenge those opposing Mr. Barrett to prove three things he said were wrong. How can you, in good conscience, moderate in this anti-American way?
OK... I said my piece. Delete away. I won't be back. Everyone go back to sleep now, while responsible American citizens pursue and broadcast the truth that will save this country for you.
That was fast, Mods! LOL!
You have to understand that it's up to the nutjobs like you to provide concrete evidence your conspiracy theories are true, not the other way around. We can throw all kinds of weird claims around with absolutely no evidence about what allegedly happened in history, and then challenge people to prove they're false. If people couldn't prove they were false, it wouldn't lend any credibility whatsover to their claims. The fact is it's usually impossible to prove a negative, i.e. prove something never happened.