Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Redcloak

Some quibble about legal definition? Seems like if it is a weapon and works by fire it is a firearm.


7 posted on 06/29/2006 10:27:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
Some quibble about legal definition? Seems like if it is a weapon and works by fire it is a firearm.

I'd say yes, generally, except that apparently the state has a law defining them and specifically excludes black powder muzzle loaders. If that is so, this ruling sounds like capriciousness.

12 posted on 06/29/2006 10:36:42 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Actually, the Feds only regulate 100 year old or less firearms.

Any firearm manufactured over 100 years ago, or is a reproduction of one, is not regulated.

Just think, the 1911 .45ACP is 95 years old, and counting...

25 posted on 06/29/2006 11:23:51 AM PDT by Burro Driver (Arm the Homeless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson