Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice to Israel: ‘Show Restraint’
Arutz 7 ^ | June 29, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/29/2006 9:23:08 AM PDT by Nachum

(IsraelNN.com) United States Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice joined the G8 industrialized nations group in calling for restraint by IDF forces that entered Gaza to rescue a soldier who was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists on Sunday.

Rice added that diplomatic officials continue to work toward obtaining the release of 19-year-old Corporal Gilad Shalit, who was taken hostage during the raid on an IDF outpost near the Kerem Shalom border crossing. Two soldiers were killed and four others wounded in the attack.

Shalit’s whereabouts are unknown and his captors refuse to return him.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel; restraint; rice; show; to
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: netmilsmom
"Really, does anyone think that the USA could possibly say, you go for it? Right out loud, I mean."

You mean like the Brits, Italians and Australians did for us after 911. Surely we could do the same for an ally.

101 posted on 06/29/2006 10:51:16 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah and look what "Restraint’" has done after all these years....


102 posted on 06/29/2006 10:52:22 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

"Is this really Condoleeza Rice talking or the President? "

I'll turn your question around. Is Bush monitoring what she's saying and making sure that it is what he believes? If so Bush is wrong. If not, he is not doing his job.


103 posted on 06/29/2006 10:52:41 AM PDT by strategofr (H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

Well, whatever we have been "saying privately" for decades isn't getting the job done or the conflict resolved.


104 posted on 06/29/2006 10:56:30 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

You're all forgetting something.

This call for restraint is coming from Rice under the umbrella of the G8.

Think the G8 is sending Israel back channel encouragement?

It means what it says.

And the US, especially considering the US status in the WOT, should not be a party to such a disgusting betrayal of a friend at war.


105 posted on 06/29/2006 10:57:04 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Bandar Bush in 08: Continue the Legacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Convert from ECUSA

I feel genuinely honored to have gotten a "Nailed It" picture. Thanks!

Now I only wish that those in the Dept. of Surrender and the White House would be deserving of one. Note that I'm not holding my breath.


106 posted on 06/29/2006 10:57:46 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Condi Rice to the Jews mourning for those murdered by terrorists, "Restraint". ========= Jerusalem =========

In Jerusalem, Israel, at the funeral of Jewish settler Eliahu Asehri in Jerusalem, Thursday, June 29, 2006
murdered by Palestinian terrorists funded by the EU and US State Dept.


Condi Rice to the terrorists, "Murder all whom you want.
More money from US taxpayers is on the way. "

========= Ramallah =========

In Ramallah, Hamas terrorists demand more murders.


107 posted on 06/29/2006 10:58:16 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wish? How has it been otherwise?

We have always had their back. That's how it's always been. There is, however, a public game you have to play.


108 posted on 06/29/2006 10:59:48 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
"and the US, especially considering the US status in the WOT, should not be a party to such a disgusting betrayal of a friend at war."

I think I'm wearing out the nailed it picture, but what the heck:


109 posted on 06/29/2006 11:00:03 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Mexico: America's Palestine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The feel good option is to say, unload with both barrels. But you cant undo that once it is started. It will be very, very messy.


110 posted on 06/29/2006 11:00:11 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
"Now I only wish that those in the Dept. of Surrender and the White House would be deserving of one. Note that I'm not holding my breath."

Me either, I gave up on them some time ago.
111 posted on 06/29/2006 11:01:01 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Mexico: America's Palestine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: strategofr


Exactly!
112 posted on 06/29/2006 11:04:36 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Mexico: America's Palestine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

When I think someone is right on, I usually post it, or the other one. Seems a number of folks on this thread have gotten my Amen Corner going - bless 'em!


113 posted on 06/29/2006 11:06:23 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Mexico: America's Palestine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tiberius109
Yesterday there was a thread about Fatah kidnapping a 65 year old man which would make all these poor Palestinians perfect candidates for the endangered species list.
114 posted on 06/29/2006 11:07:21 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

>> You mean like the Brits, Italians and Australians did for us after 911. Surely we could do the same for an ally.<<

Sorry to say, our government would never be as brave.


115 posted on 06/29/2006 11:09:13 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

We are fighting the war on terror by trying to win their hearts and minds, giving them freedom from tyranny. The biggest problem with this is that we are dealing with people whose religious idealology does not allow for freedom. It is an idealology that glorifies death and hatred for those who do not agree with them. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken sh!t.


116 posted on 06/29/2006 11:12:13 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

And perhaps this...
>>restraint by IDF forces that entered Gaza to rescue a soldier who was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists on Sunday."

may be an all bets are off with the murder, statement.


117 posted on 06/29/2006 11:13:19 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
"The feel good option is to say, unload with both barrels. But you cant undo that once it is started. It will be very, very messy."

Don't you get it? It got very, very messy on 911. Sadly your sentiment represents the majority of the American public. They don't feel that we are really in a war. Remember all the talk about you're either with us or against us? Remember if you sponsor, harbor or financially support terrorists that you would be treated as a terrorist? Well it's past time for us to put up or shut the hell up. Our statement of support for Israel needs to be said just as boldly as the "with us or against us" statement. Not by some weasel back channel support statement. They're our ally and they have been attacked. We should stand with them.

118 posted on 06/29/2006 11:13:30 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

To Rics: we already did that and this is the result, NO WAY, the gloves are off. Amen.


119 posted on 06/29/2006 11:15:43 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Should a chief executive have subordinates making significant policy decisions with which he disagrees?


120 posted on 06/29/2006 11:18:19 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson