Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Documents: Plans To Produce Prohibited Chemical Weapons Precursors (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | June 28 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/28/2006 6:34:38 PM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2006 6:34:40 PM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Ping


2 posted on 06/28/2006 6:36:53 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Wow, does it actually say "precursor"? I'm pinging now.


3 posted on 06/28/2006 6:42:45 PM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great work as always, JV! So much smoke, and yet some still claim there's no fire.


4 posted on 06/28/2006 6:42:45 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Excellent job as always.


5 posted on 06/28/2006 6:43:11 PM PDT by Heatseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow; Bahbah; SJackson; sono; rodguy911; tiredoflaundry; cibco; sofaman; hattend; A.Hun; ...

ping


6 posted on 06/28/2006 6:43:46 PM PDT by AliVeritas ("One for all , all for kicking *ss and taking names" ...Scratch taking names.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Fedora; Howlin; ravingnutter; piasa; Peach; Grampa Dave; pinz-n-needlez; canadianally; ...

Oh, my!! This sounds like the most clear-cut expression of operational plans to produce precursors for chem weapons..... in 2002!!

But if we don't have "stockpiles" of 100,000 new chem warheads then I guess we just don't have anything, now do we?

I've thought all along that Saddam's regime would have reason to keep precursor chemicals separately, both to maximize longevity and so that they could maintain the fiction that they were merely producing ag pesticides or whatever...... can anyone track the various "pesticides" and chemicals that have been found since the 2003 invasion?

Great job once again, jveritas!! The net is closing and the fools who parrot the talking points for the DNC and Saddam's Baghdad Bob may finally face the reckoning.


7 posted on 06/28/2006 6:44:20 PM PDT by Enchante (Keller & Sulzberger: Forget elections, WE are the self-appointed judges of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks.


8 posted on 06/28/2006 6:44:36 PM PDT by AliVeritas ("One for all , all for kicking *ss and taking names" ...Scratch taking names.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
jv has done amazing work on this.

I just hope more conservative-leaning media get it out there. Whatever happened to reporting?

9 posted on 06/28/2006 6:46:05 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Iraqi Documents: Plans To Produce Prohibited Chemical Weapons Precursors (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

Mark Eichenlaub Documenting Saddam Hussein's State Sponsorship of Terrorism

10 posted on 06/28/2006 6:47:00 PM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
Yes document CMPC-2003-013956 call it Precursor. Of course they did not state it is "Chemical Weapon" precursor but the UN document was very clear about these materials being used a precursors for Chemical Weapons.
11 posted on 06/28/2006 6:47:31 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; All

I'll post to you but I know other FReepers will read this - What else is referred to as precursors?


12 posted on 06/28/2006 6:48:52 PM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas; jveritas

Could someone please explain how UN Sanctions will stop Iran's Nuclear Weapons production? Anyone ...


13 posted on 06/28/2006 6:48:58 PM PDT by sono ("May the Wings of Liberty never lose a feather." Jack Burton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Coop

The Left and few on the right will not be convinced unless we found at one million tons of WMD, even then they will tell us it is pre-1991 so it does not count, Saddam was a harmless person :)


14 posted on 06/28/2006 6:49:44 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sono

It will not.


15 posted on 06/28/2006 6:50:08 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; jveritas

Thank you


16 posted on 06/28/2006 6:50:25 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

The local production of these precursors had only one intent: CHEMICAL WEAPONS.


17 posted on 06/28/2006 6:51:09 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sono; AliVeritas; jveritas

Awesome job. Again. Joseph, you need to put a tip jar on your blog. I feel like I owe you money for the work you are doing. If you need help in setting one up PM me and I will help you do it.


18 posted on 06/28/2006 6:52:12 PM PDT by ikez78 (http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Enchante; jveritas
"Great job once again, jveritas!! The net is closing and the fools who parrot the talking points for the DNC and Saddam's Baghdad Bob may finally face the reckoning."
I second the motion. If enough of these documents see the light of day. The burden is heavy on this administration, and all neutral and conservative news sources to start assembling into "clear cases", what we continue to read in some times isolated form. We need able authors to get this stuff into book form and on the shelves of American book stores.
Surely the L/MSM will do it's best to only report isolated things they can with clever words challenge the validity of the over all plans Saddam had to reconstitute all his wmd programs.
Most Freepers and other conservative sites do not have to be convinced. Many of us have followed this stuff prior to the invasion in essence. The masses must be informed somewhere along the line.
19 posted on 06/28/2006 6:56:22 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
Indeed in document ISGQ-2003-00044424 the one reseracher told the Industrial Commission that SODIUM CYANIDE was not allowed to be produced locally but despite his warning he was bypassed by higher ups and the Sodium Cyanide was mentioned in a later memo that it is a material to be produced locally.
20 posted on 06/28/2006 6:56:48 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson