To: Jameison
Rubbish? Really?
I can only imagine what we would now be saying if this was Clinton who was doing this.
91 posted on
06/28/2006 9:21:40 AM PDT by
mcvey
(Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
To: mcvey
The key to this discussion is co-equal branches of government. The Congress can't pass a law forcing the Executive to not execute his Constitutional duties. If they want to amend the Constitution, so be it. However, the Executive has just as much authority to Constitutional interpretation as the other two branches of government and he can make his views and challenges to laws and their amendments known.
103 posted on
06/28/2006 9:36:31 AM PDT by
pgyanke
(Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
To: mcvey
"I can only imagine what we would now be saying if this was Clinton who was doing this."Clinton WAS doing this. Clinton DID do this. It was one of the few things he did that WAS legal. Interesting screen name.
130 posted on
06/28/2006 10:17:51 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
To: mcvey
"I can only imagine what we would now be saying if this was Clinton who was doing this."
From what I can gather BJ Klinton used to do that regularly, without as much as a whimper from the arrogant, power drunk Arlene Sphincter.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson