To: MBB1984
If not for Bush, Spector likely would have been beaten. Wow, I must have been out of the loop longer than I thought. When did the POTUS start appointing the SINators of Pennsylvania? When did the voters quit making that choice?
150 posted on
06/28/2006 10:44:55 AM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: Just A Nobody
Get real. The President doesn't actively campaign on behalf of certain politicians as some sort of tribal ritual. The office of the President of United States has considerable power and influence. Public endorsement and active campaigning by the President of the United States makes a critical impression on the minds of primary voters. This is particularly so in a close election. Bush deliberately chose to actively support Spector and both Spector and Bush knew it would have a significant impact at the polls. And, in fact it helped Spector win a close race against a conservative.
156 posted on
06/28/2006 11:04:54 AM PDT by
MBB1984
To: Just A Nobody
"When did the POTUS start appointing the SINators of Pennsylvania? When did the voters quit making that choice?"It's just the Buchannonites crawling out of the woodwork to Bushbash. And I speak as someone who really DID vote for Toomey, though I knew he would lose. His AIM was too high for his name recognition. End of story. However, it's a lot easier to blame Bush and Santorum instead.
157 posted on
06/28/2006 11:04:54 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson