Skip to comments.
Grand jury to hear case of alleged sexual offer at mall (Man wanted 14 y.o. to make porn movie)
The Virginian Pilot ^
| 6/28/06
| Michelle Washington
Posted on 06/28/2006 5:15:27 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
He dropped his bags and chased the man, catching him near the mall's information desk. He prevented the man from leaving until police arrived. If I had been the father he would have needed paramedics before the police ever got there.
1
posted on
06/28/2006 5:15:31 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: plan2succeed.org
2
posted on
06/28/2006 5:16:52 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGDISCUSSION ABOUT:
Grand jury to hear case of alleged sexual offer at mall (Man wanted 14 y.o. to make porn movie)
This is just another instance of how pornography is not as harmless as people would like us to believe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FReepMail wagglebee.
3
posted on
06/28/2006 5:19:33 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
The man is scum. The incident is shameful. No doubt.
However, it's not clear to me that a crime was committed. No one did anything. Words were exchanged. If I were the father, I'd be upset, but I don't expect a court to do anything.
4
posted on
06/28/2006 5:20:09 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Without a monkey, "You are nothing, absolutely zero. Absolutely nothing.")
To: ClearCase_guy
However, it's not clear to me that a crime was committed. No one did anything. Words were exchanged. If I were the father, I'd be upset, but I don't expect a court to do anything. Most fathers probably would not involve the Courts, anyway.
5
posted on
06/28/2006 5:29:14 AM PDT
by
Gorzaloon
To: ClearCase_guy
I agree.
There was no law broken as far as I can tell. It's not illegal to be stupid.
To: wagglebee
the man was halfway down the hall, the father said, and getting farther away all the time, and the security guard did nothing.. Security guards are generally useless when a real emergency occurs. Call 9-1-1 instead.
To: ClearCase_guy
Maybe the grand jury can resolve some of the questions unanswered and unasked in this article. Was the guy really trying to make a porno movie? Was he using that as a method of approaching children? Was there any investigation to see if he was collecting and/or distributing child porn? Has there been any investigation?
If he had made this contact over the internet his home would be raided and all of his records seized. In that case the "victim" would have been a middle aged male police officer. Does that make a difference? I can't see any reason for him to solicit a child in this manner unless he had "evil" intentions.
8
posted on
06/28/2006 5:36:54 AM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: ConservativeMind
What part of soliciting a 14 yo to be in a porno film don't you understand?
Why do you think these people were testifying, if the judge did not think the act was illegal?
9
posted on
06/28/2006 5:38:39 AM PDT
by
burroak
To: wagglebee
I would have told the guard, "Call 911. That SOB is going to need an ambulance."
10
posted on
06/28/2006 5:40:29 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah" = Satan in disguise)
To: ConservativeMind; ClearCase_guy
I'm fairly certain that soliciting a minor for child pornography is a crime.
11
posted on
06/28/2006 5:40:46 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: ConservativeMind
P.S. Guess that's why you are not in jail.
12
posted on
06/28/2006 5:41:06 AM PDT
by
burroak
To: burroak
13
posted on
06/28/2006 5:44:11 AM PDT
by
Shimmer128
(Anything that offends 3 people must be banned. The 200 million just have to suck it up.)
To: wagglebee
The man, Charles A. Speller, was charged in March with producing sexually explicit material after the girl said Speller offered her $200 to be in his "porno." Am I missing something here? How does asking a 14 year old girl (who might plausibly be mistaken for an 18+-year-old) if she'd like to make a quick buck by being in a "porno" constitute "producing sexually explicit material"? And since when is "producing sexually explicit material" a crime, unless one actually uses one or more minors in the process? Per the info in this article, the guy never even touched the girl, much less used her in producing a porn flick.
I can't fathom why the courts are involved in this. The girl's parents should teach her how to handle this sort of crap, i.e. to respond by loudly yelling in the guy's face "NO, I WOULD NOT LIKE TO MAKE A QUICK $200 IN YOUR PORNO!" That way, when her father was 20 feet away from her, he wouldn't have had to "wonder why a strange man was speaking to her" and "tail the man, who had walked away but then doubled back and followed the girl." And what kind of parent walks AWAY from his unattended adolescent daughter in a mall, after seeing a "strange man" approach her and speak to her?
To: wagglebee
But according to the article, that's not what Speller is charged with.
To: burroak; wagglebee
If you don't know their age (i.e.-walking around in a mall), then how can you be held for asking a question of someone for an otherwise legal act?
It's the same as if asking them if they want to get a drink (alcohol) or go grab a smoke.
By the way, I'm not for pornography, drinking, or smoking (I have no attraction to any of it).
To: burroak; wagglebee; GovernmentShrinker
It's my guess the police merely charged him with something to assuage the father. The charge will certainly be thrown out, as nothing was produced.
To: burroak
What part of soliciting a 14 yo to be in a porno film don't you understand? Exactly! Should we doubt this guy wouldn't have been able to find some kid who was eager for the chance to make money if he kept looking?
He played with fire and he got burned, they oughta fry him.
Scum!
To: ClearCase_guy
it's not clear to me that a crime was committed. No one did anything. Someone DID do something, Solicitation of a minor is a crime. Child pornography is a crime. Soliciting a minor to make child pornography is a crime.
Kudos to this dad for chasing this POS down.
19
posted on
06/28/2006 7:45:33 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
To: ConservativeMind
If you don't know their age (i.e.-walking around in a mall), then how can you be held for asking a question of someone for an otherwise legal act? It's the same as if asking them if they want to get a drink (alcohol) or go grab a smoke.
Um, you are legally required to ascertain a person's age before selling or providing said persons with alcohol or tobacco. Same applies to pornography.
Saying you didn't know how old they are is not a defense to the law.
20
posted on
06/28/2006 7:55:38 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson