[dmz]

This is the second thread with the same stupid question being asked. Since when was this ever made for "Married Men" only?
________

LOL. I thought social conservatives routinely condemned sex between unmarried people. Or is that only for "lefty" unmarried people? Can you imagine the fur that would be flying if it were x42 who had been stopped at the airport under these circumstances?

The idea of "consenting adults" should not take into account who those consenting adults are.

2 bottles of viagra? How many tabs in each?

For the record - I don't care who Rush is having sex with, the circumstances thereof, his chemical needs for same. Sex between consenting adults isn't anyone's biz now, apparently (unlike a few years ago). {running for cover}

[Quick1]

Can you imagine the fur that would be flying if it were x42 who had been stopped at the airport under these circumstances?

I don't think that there is a font size big enough for the Drudge headline on that one. But I LOL just to think about it.

[Bommer]

LOL. I thought social conservatives routinely condemned sex between unmarried people.

No. They condem it when a person who is the Chief Law Enforcer of the land lies about it in fron of a grand jury to save his own @ss in a sexual harassment case!

[balch3]

abstinence until marriage is the only way. But nobody's perfect, and Rush has been great on so many things that I don't see why we shouldn't cut him some slack. And if it was Clinton, people would be up in arms and rightly so. Totally different situations. Rush is a good man with some flaws, like we all have. Clinton is abominable.