Sounds like my kind of "fiends" ROFL:)
This could be the same fellow who was discussing this last week also- David Somebody...I think I have the info in my lists..will check and see...
Someone else had this story last week; NewxMax or WND? I've forgotten.
I don't get this type of thing at all. Color me confused, Ernest.
Ike - ping to the article and post #60.
I fail to understand why this guy (along with his 3 buddies) isn't/aren't believed. They have the goods, that's for sure.
Problem is that their story points a nasty finger at the CIA, who refused to (1) follow-up on their reports, (2) at the one site the CIA did show up at, they failed to bring the heavy equipment required to get through the water-filled walls and interiors - all booby-traps laid by Saddam's scientists when they configured these sites for maximum security. There were 4 such sites identified by these AF guys - containing WMD's in 3, and the missiles to carry them in the 4th, missiles that were longer ranger than Saddam was "supposed" to have.
I fail to understand why the White House doesn't follow up on these reports. I know why the CIA doesn't. They hate the President, and now that Porter Goss is gone, they no longer fear being thrown out on their tails for their attempts to undermine this President.