Posted on 06/26/2006 10:55:26 AM PDT by headsonpikes
Larry is obviously intending this article to be anti-Harper. It sounded very pro-Harper to me!
"Larry is obviously intending this article to be anti-Harper. It sounded very pro-Harper to me!"
LOL! We can only hope that Harper is as cold-water conservative as the lefty freak Zolf portrays him.
He sounds like a cool guy to me.
Sheesh...they have crybabies up there too?
nah. I would argue that american libertarian and american conservative have joined forces to become neo-con, which started with Ronald Reagan
I thought Marx wanted the withering away of the state. Hadn't the author better criticize Castro for being a Marxist on the road to abolishing the state and all the good that it does?
Where's Mussolini when you need him?
<< Here's some red meat for the Canada-haters .... >>
Thank you for the ping but if it is all the same to you, I shall leave it to Canada's haters.
Perhaps for a change, they'll project their [Pathological] hatreds upon one another?
God knows its how they're voluntarily and willingly governed. They, after all, the ones who line up to elect their envy, hatred and rage-institutionalizing gangsters-posing-as-politicians and hold out their enslaved hands for the proceeds of such of other folks lives' energies those polls steal for them and are willing to dole out.
Yes, the Canucklehead left thinks just like the Democrat base stateside.
On another note, have you ever considered trying decaffeinated coffee?
<< Oops! Did I say Pol Pot? >>
Hear! Hear! Well said, Sir!
[Whoops, should have read that before my first post]
The only essential differences between the other two and M. Pol Pot are the differences of ethnicity and of geography. All three -- as is the useful idiot who spewed this piece -- are otherwise indistinguishable from one another and are but manifestations of the same evil.
[And Mr Harper sounds like an absolute doll. Prayers and trust directed his way! And, sadly, a bet that the evil manifest in modern Canada will destroy him]
Would Red Tories be the equivilent of Big Government Conservatives here in the States? If so, wouldn't that make President Bush a Red Tory?
<< ... have you ever considered trying decaffeinated coffee? >>
Good one. But I don't drink -- not even coffee.
[Or as an Aussie mate of mine once observed: "Don't drink, don't smoke - or rent me arse to any blokes]
<];^)~<
Canada ping!
Please send a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.
Media bias? Definitely. I wouldn't expect anything else from the CBC.
Ummmm, surely you don't judge us all based on the attitudes of some.
I love the outraged, J'Accuse! tone as the author spits out these accusations like he expects the reader to be horrified.
Larry Zolf and his like cannot conceive of life without an overwhelming Authority, preferably legitimate, but definitely overwhelming.
The public schools have done their job well.
A "neo-conservative" on this side of the border without a fence is a former liberal who has been mugged.
Followers of Hayek calling themselves neo-conservatives may exist, but they have to be rare. More commonly, they'll be libertarians or old-right Republicans in the mold of Sen. Robert Taft.
Is it possible that the pejorative use of "neo-conservative" has so permeated the left-wing political lexicon that nowadays anyone the left finds fault with is routinely given that label?
Even the title was an intentional waving of a red flag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.