Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

Excellent. It is time to do something about the treasonous liberal media and make a lesson to all of them by going after the head of Hate and Treason, the New York Times.


3 posted on 06/26/2006 8:25:37 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Peach; Bahbah; Mo1; freema; Coop; mystery-ak; Txsleuth; Allegra; TexKat; saveliberty; ...

NYT ping:)


8 posted on 06/26/2006 8:27:38 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas
I believe the NYT is just itching for the federal government to come after them.

The old adage "there is no such thing as bad publicity..."fits here.

Thousands of people in the US and Europe knew about this policy. To even frog march the government leaker would prove fruitless.

No sir. Just having the administration publicly denounce it should be enough. The NYT is a dying paper anyway. It's not even the #1 daily in NYC.

Just an opinion....of course.

17 posted on 06/26/2006 8:30:59 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

It's also time to find out who is leaking TO the pressholes, and charge them with treason. Anybody got a guess who the leaker to the press is?


"Excellent. It is time to do something about the treasonous liberal media and make a lesson to all of them by going after the head of Hate and Treason, the New York Times."



107 posted on 06/26/2006 9:39:24 AM PDT by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24
In a note on the paper's Web site Sunday, Executive Editor Bill Keller said the Times spent weeks discussing with Bush administration officials whether to publish the report.

He said part of the government's argument was that the anti-terror program would no longer be effective if it became known, because ..... terrorists would find other ways to move money.

"We don't know what the banking consortium will do, but we found this argument puzzling," Keller said

This is a treasonous lie.

Any idiot would not be puzzled that the terrorists would find OTHER WAYS to move their money.

These newspaper traitors are not stupid; they knew exactly what they were up to.

They were warning the terrorists.

BECAUSE THEY ARE ON THE TERRORISTS SIDE.

143 posted on 06/26/2006 10:09:21 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24
In a note on the paper's Web site Sunday, Executive Editor Bill Keller said the Times spent weeks discussing with Bush administration officials whether to publish the report.

He said part of the government's argument was that the anti-terror program would no longer be effective if it became known, because ..... terrorists would find other ways to move money.

"We don't know what the banking consortium will do, but we found this argument puzzling," Keller said

This is a treasonous lie.

Any idiot would not be puzzled that the terrorists would find OTHER WAYS to move their money.

These newspaper traitors are not stupid; they knew exactly what they were up to.

They were warning the terrorists.

BECAUSE THEY ARE ON THE TERRORISTS SIDE.

145 posted on 06/26/2006 10:09:23 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson