Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
If certain precautions should be taken, why isn't that written into state law?

I think it should be, until we get to the real solution of legalizing and regulating production.

Perhaps it should be banned until they figure it out, huh?

Nah, the energy expended on banning would be better spent on legislating and/or publicizing those precautions.

Hey, as long as it goes through the same process as the other drugs I have no problem with that.

You mean the same process as other drugs that don't offer potential for large profits ... namely, the orpahn-drug process? That would certainly beat a flat ban ... although I prefer to see less government interference in medicine across the board.

208 posted on 07/02/2006 3:48:34 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights
"You mean the same process as other drugs that don't offer potential for large profits"

Huh? Who's talking about those? The same process for approval as was done for the other nausea drugs.

Problem with English?

211 posted on 07/03/2006 4:44:21 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson