Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon developing supersonic shape-shifting assassin [Switchblade UAV]
CNN ^ | June 23, 2006 | Noah Shachtman

Posted on 06/25/2006 1:45:41 PM PDT by Gideon7

For years, the U.S. military has wanted a plane that could loiter just outside enemy territory for more than a dozen hours and, on command, hurtle toward a target faster than the speed of sound. And then level it.

But aircraft that excel at subsonic flight are inefficient at Mach speeds, and vice versa. The answer is Switchblade, an unmanned, shape-changing plane concept under development by Northrop Grumman.

When completed (target date: 2020), it will cruise with its 200-foot-long wing perpendicular to its engines like a normal airplane. But just before the craft breaks the sound barrier, its single wing will swivel around 60 degrees (hence the name) so that one end points forward and the other back.

This oblique configuration redistributes the shock waves that pile up in front of a plane at Mach speeds and cause drag. When the Switchblade returns to subsonic speeds, the wing will rotate back to perpendicular...

If all goes well, Darpa says, a 40-foot-wingspan demonstration model could be ready by 2010, and a full-size Switchblade should be all set for a brawl by 2020.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bomber; darpa; flight; military; miltech; supersonic; uav; usairforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Those guys at DARPA get all the cool toys.
1 posted on 06/25/2006 1:45:44 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

2 posted on 06/25/2006 1:49:31 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
DARPA is one part of the federal budget that I don't begrudge. Paying a bunch of geniuses to sit around and think smart stuff. DARPANET ROCKS!

/johnny

3 posted on 06/25/2006 1:51:52 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (D@mmit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Like this:


4 posted on 06/25/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Wonder how they are coming on "Loki"?

Loki, a manned, underwater craft analogous to a modern fighter aircraft.They say it has a "Vortex generator"?? The budget is quite impressive too. Should be well along the timeline by now.
5 posted on 06/25/2006 1:54:47 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Compliments of Luftwaffe '46

ME P.1109: This project number is not entirely certain, as the original document is damaged and barely readable. This was a further development of Dr. Vogt's work on the BV P.202 dated July 15, 1944, and was similar in that the sweep of the wings could be varied to improve low-speed flight characteristics. There were two variable-sweep wings, one above and one below the fuselage. Two He S 011 turbojets were mounted in nacelles and were located on each side of the fuselage. Apparently, this design was the subject of some further development after the war, according to some sketches discovered in France, but it is not known whether this was done by Messerschmitt or some other firm.

And this is not the only one from the Nazi's aviation braintrust that features variable wings...

6 posted on 06/25/2006 2:03:10 PM PDT by Bender2 (Gad! The inmates have control... And I'm trying to quit smoking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

They should just mount a big spring on the back of the wing where it attaches to the body of the plane with a hinge. As the plane speeds up, the wing folds back. Jeesh. Simple.


7 posted on 06/25/2006 2:07:24 PM PDT by DC Bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DC Bound

I built one of those as a kid, an Estes model rocket. The wing was held in-line to the tube body with a rubber band. When the rocket motor ejected at apogee, the swing snapped out and away it flew.

It went a looong way. Never did recover it :-)


8 posted on 06/25/2006 2:11:04 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
More like the NASA AD-1..


9 posted on 06/25/2006 2:13:44 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Actually, it looks like this:


10 posted on 06/25/2006 2:17:27 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

talk about assymmetric!


11 posted on 06/25/2006 2:18:38 PM PDT by patton (...in spit of it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7








Pravda
12 posted on 06/25/2006 2:20:30 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
This stuff is so high tech and cool you'd think someday we may even be able to put the kabosh on 5th century ragheads putting bombs in cars.

Geesh.

13 posted on 06/25/2006 2:24:04 PM PDT by zarf (It's not a question.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
Some very interesting things on the Pravda site.

Here's one of them:

Now, that's deadly.

14 posted on 06/25/2006 2:38:17 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (orwell's watching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Now, that's deadly.

Then it's obviously my time to go. Let the undertaker leave the smile on my face. 8>)

/johnny

15 posted on 06/25/2006 2:53:27 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (D@mmit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Pravada is russian propaganda garbage. Counter coup group in washington. LOL! love the idiotic sensationlism. Im sure the brainwashed russians lap this up like milk. Sheeple.


16 posted on 06/25/2006 2:54:07 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
switch blade or swing blade, ummm hmmmm?.

you got any napalm on them 'taters ?

17 posted on 06/25/2006 3:02:12 PM PDT by llevrok (The next "greatest generation" is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Nothing will replace ground troops...see, that's why we are still in Iraq. We took out saddam and baghdad with smart bombs years ago...our ground troops are still there. Use all the technology anyone wants to use for winning any war...and you still need groundtroops.

Unless some nutcase unleashes nuclear weapons, which I highly doubt will happen since I believe "nukular weapons" are still a scare tactic used by the powers that be, groundtroops have always won the battles.

JMHO

FMCDH(BITS)

18 posted on 06/25/2006 3:10:57 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

19 posted on 06/25/2006 3:22:42 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

A real Honey Trap.


20 posted on 06/25/2006 3:23:16 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson