To: SE Mom
John Warner is very unimpressive. I can't believe this guy is the head of the Armed Services Committee.
149 posted on
06/25/2006 6:12:35 AM PDT by
Bulldaddy
(www.constructionlawblog.net)
To: Bulldaddy
Levin also has to throw in the "military cover up", in the mix.
151 posted on
06/25/2006 6:13:59 AM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
To: Bulldaddy
IMHO, 90% of the Senate is unimpressive.
To: Bulldaddy
Well, he is 79 years old, so maybe that has something to do with it.
165 posted on
06/25/2006 6:19:18 AM PDT by
dmw
To: Bulldaddy
John Warner is very unimpressive. I can't believe this guy is the head of the Armed Services Committee.I always think of him as the poster boy for self-inflated Senatorial egos.....a walking definition of one who is "full of himself".
217 posted on
06/25/2006 6:33:38 AM PDT by
Reo
To: Bulldaddy
John Warner is very unimpressive.Why else do you think they invite him on to represent the Republicans? There are only a few types of "our side" spokesmen they'll invite on:
- those that actually disagree with us
- those that they can discredit with some sucker punch or cheap shot
- those who are completely ineffective
I'm sure there are a few more, but very rarely will you see someone who does not represent at least one of these types.
522 posted on
06/25/2006 10:08:27 AM PDT by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson