Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lichtblau of 'NYT' Explains Attempt to Halt His Bank Records Scoop
Editior and Publisher ^ | 06/ 23/2006 | Joe Strupp

Posted on 06/24/2006 9:24:07 PM PDT by airedale

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: ashamedtobefromparkridge
911 and a few weeks after was the best weeks most print news in circulation in a long time and I would bet they are actually encouraging the Jihads to strike again in order to increase circulation again and get President Bush.
21 posted on 06/24/2006 9:59:32 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: airedale

22 posted on 06/24/2006 10:03:11 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ashamedtobefromparkridge
I heard people were high fiving at the Ny Times on 9/11.

No!! Where did you hear this? Who could DO that?! It was in their own city!!!

23 posted on 06/24/2006 10:04:33 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: airedale

"We waited so long that the competition caught up to us"

So, just like the dems, it's about competition. It's not about America.


24 posted on 06/24/2006 10:04:40 PM PDT by Explorer24 (Sorry America if you're attacked again, we had to be first to the presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Because they would be--they think fetuses are things, but someone who writes for the New York Times is one of the Beautiful People.


25 posted on 06/24/2006 10:06:32 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: airedale
He noted that there had been no proof that the previous story had endangered national security. "Our belief that it did not have any tangible impact has been borne out," he said.

Huh? How on earth would this scumbag Lickblow know THAT?

26 posted on 06/24/2006 10:12:34 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
This guy should be stood up, tied to a post and given the option of a blind fold before he hears for the last time the click of triggers being pulled.

Awwww, at least let him have a cigarette........ (sarcasm)

27 posted on 06/24/2006 10:18:38 PM PDT by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: airedale

OK, I'm not an idiot, so I realize that the purpose of this story and the wiretapping "scandal" story, among others, is to provide fodder for the vile MSM to attempt to sway the sheeple.

That said, I distinctly remember hearing, a while back, news about any financial transactions over a certain number being scrutinized. If you sell your home, that transaction is easily linked to the deposit so it wouldn't raise red flags. But if $30,000.00 suddenly showed up in your account without being traceable to a salary, sale or loan, it would be subject to scrutiny.

In the same vein, I distinctly recall hearing about "Echelon" which would review our emails and telephone calls for certain terminology. This, during the Clinton administration.

When my husband lived overseas, I was acutely aware that our conversations could be monitored, even the non-DSN calls. It never crossed my mind that they would be totally private, as I was placing or receiving international calls to a Middle Eastern country.

It is much ado about NOTHING!!! Why isn't the administration pointing this out, repeatedly!!!


28 posted on 06/24/2006 10:19:44 PM PDT by GatorGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale

"the intense public interest in the NSA story showed that this is obviously a matter of intense public interest."

this guy's really articulate, isn't he ?


29 posted on 06/24/2006 10:22:56 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
He has no idea if the wiretapping story hurt us because no Al Queda operative is dumb enough to say "We changed our methods because the NYT obligingly let us know what you were doing to intercept our communications".

Also, if a newspaper in a country where Al Queda has a presence was stupid enough to reveal Al Queda changes in operations and methods that were brought about by the dumb*ss NYT gift to terror, the publishers, editors and reporters of that paper would be given the same treatment as our POWs and hostages have received, and I ain't talking panties on the head.

While I don't admire much about the enemy, I do envy the way they keep their press from committing treason.
30 posted on 06/24/2006 10:28:19 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: airedale
He noted that there had been no proof that the previous story had endangered national security.

How would he know, the stupid SOB. And why should we wait for proof that our national security has been endangered, anyway? What an a**. No wonder people are turning away from newspapers in droves.

31 posted on 06/24/2006 10:42:19 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
It is much ado about NOTHING!!! Why isn't the administration pointing this out, repeatedly!!!

Well thank you for saying that! I said something quite similar last night. The President said after 9/11 that they were going to choke off AQ's money flow. I assumed then that they were going to be surveiling transactions all over the world, including the US. How else were they going to trace the money? A crystal ball? I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone with this being major news. But as I said last night, I guess the press wanted to be sure that our enemy "got it". They had to come out with something after Zark and some of his top people got roasted.

32 posted on 06/24/2006 11:30:24 PM PDT by daybreakcoming (If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

The fact that he's an idiot is prove positive that he's an idiot.


33 posted on 06/25/2006 12:12:44 AM PDT by watchin (Facts irritate liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: airedale

Licorice: "You stupid dhimmis should hang all these seditious traitors
who repeatedly, willfully, and with absolutely NO FEAR, continue to violate 18 U.S.C. §798,
beginning with Keller and Lichtblau, or what is coming will only help the New York Times' circulation."


18 U.S.C. §798. Disclosure of Classified Information.
(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—
(1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—Shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (b) As used in this subsection (a) of this section—
The term “classified information” means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution; .........
The term “communication intelligence” means all procedures and methods used in the interception of communications and the obtaining of information from such communications by other than the intended recipients;
The term “unauthorized person” means any person who, or agency which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the head of a department or agency of the United States Government which is expressly designated by the President to engage in communication intelligence activities for the United States.


"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana


34 posted on 06/25/2006 3:47:07 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
He deserves a trial before he gets his just due.


35 posted on 06/25/2006 7:35:42 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: airedale
"Our belief....has been borne out." What an unbelievably arrogant statement. WHO THE HELL VOTED FOR YOU TO MAKE THIS DECISION???? If I don't agree with your decision as to what has harmed our national security, what do I do about it? Where do I go to vote you out? Who supervises you to make sure your decision is correct? What happens to you if it isn't?

Folks, we are living in a fascist dictatorship now.....not under President Bush and VP Cheney, as the nuts on the left would have us believe....no...the dictators are Eric Lichtblau, James Risen, and Dana Priest....they have declared themselves as the new arbiters of what we have the right to know and what our government is allowed to do in prosecuting a war...

How long are we supposed to put up with this before the revolution?

36 posted on 06/25/2006 8:29:03 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Meet the new dictatorship of America.....James Risen, Eric Lichtblau, and Dana Priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
I'd like to see those posters put up on the streets in NY around the NY Times offices and on some of the taxis. I'd also like to see people toast Keller & Co when they go to restaurants and bars in NY thanking them for making it easier for the terrorist to kill New Yorkers. Make them uncomfortable every where they go.
37 posted on 06/25/2006 9:58:18 AM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson