[Texasforever]

I am more interested in who told the NYT about the program.

[outofsalt]

Yes we need the leakers also, but the Sulzbergs edit, own, & publish so they are fully culpable accomplices.

[photodawg]

I am more interested in who told the NYT about the program
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

The writers of the article hold the key to the leakers identity. Prosecute the leaker through the writer and force the source to be revealed or impose jail time for contempt of court. If the reporter talks, you have the leaker. If the reporter doesn't, you have the reporter. Let him rot in a jail cell until he gives up the name.
Either way you make someone pay and set a precedent for the next time someone tries to aid the enemy.

[TexKat]

Leaks like a

[NorCalRepub]

.....exactly...I would think it was the "leaker" who violated the law......the NYT didn't, but what they did was immoral and unethical....but not illegal.....get the "leaker"

[ARealMothersSonForever]

I am more interested in who told the NYT about the program.

Me too. That is the big story that is being obscured.

[stands2reason]

Some of that poison left in the state dept. for six years...