Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grut
"All it does is forbid the federal government (only) from seizing property for the profit of private parties, which it doesn't do anyway."

It's more than you hope. It's precedent to counter more Kelo vs. New Londons except on the federal level.

You all who say this means nothing: imaging Bill Clinton, of Waco fame, with the precedent of Kelo vs. New London in his chubby, greedy hands.

As for gun rights, exactly WHAT has the president done to take away your gun rights? Hubby's and my guns are still all here. Did Bush steal your guns? Maybe using eminent domain?

38 posted on 06/24/2006 5:38:14 AM PDT by cake_crumb (One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb
As for gun rights, exactly WHAT has the president done to take away your gun rights?

Not the point, which is: that having 'talked the talk' on RKBA, he hasn't 'walked the walk' of doing something about the abuses of it which he inherited. In fact, it was Bush's Justice Department which argued for overruling Emerson.

Likewise, examined in detail, this latest EO is more high rhetoric that amounts to nothing. It's another cynical bit of lip service aimed at the base.

59 posted on 06/24/2006 12:03:16 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson