Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
This case demonstrates why a limitation of federal courts' jurisdiction is needed today, if not before. Were the federal courts, with their $150,000 judges and support staff and buildings really created for the purpose of deciding whether a certain student should or should not wear a certain T-shirt to school.

Gimme a d*mned break. Any case that does not involve the interests of at least 1,000 students, or 10% of the students in a given school or school system, should be EXCLUDED from federal jurisdiction. This is just a matter of common sense. And I would like to propose exactly such a bill in the Congress of the US.

P.S. Interested in a Freeper in Congress? Keep in touch with me.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "Tribal Loyalties and Public Lies"

24 posted on 06/23/2006 4:22:19 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
This case demonstrates why a limitation of federal courts' jurisdiction is needed today, if not before.

And the Federal legislature's jurisdiction. And the Federal Executive's jurisdiction. Would you explain to me again where the authority for the DoE and the "No Child Left Behind" act can be found among the enumerated powers of the Constitution?

30 posted on 12/15/2006 8:58:58 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson