Posted on 06/23/2006 2:09:28 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
US Treasury Secretary John Snow has defended a secret programme which has been tracking international money transactions for nearly five years. "This programme is an effective weapon in the larger war on terror," he said.
The scheme, which has sifted huge amounts of data from an international banking consortium, was revealed by the New York Times newspaper on Friday. The US treasury says the programme was strictly confined to the records of suspected foreign terrorists. Although there is no direct connection, the programme has echoes of a recently revealed US surveillance programme in which millions of international and domestic phone calls and e-mails were monitored, correspondents say. They say that although the US government insists it acted on a firm legal footing, this programme is likely to elicit similar charges of enfringement of civil liberties. 'Safeguards' "This programme is making a real difference," Mr Snow said. "It works. It's based on appropriate legal authorities, it has built-in safeguards and controls." He said the treasury was using "the tools that Congress has given us to follow the flow of terrorist money". "These flows ... lead to the terrorists themselves," he said.
The financial tracking scheme began in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the US using emergency powers invoked by President George W Bush, the New York Times revealed.
The administration's extraordinary access to this vast repository of international financial data... is a matter of public interest
The newspaper spoke to some 20 anonymous current or former government officials or industry executives. The government used powers of administrative subpoena to compel the Brussels-based banking co-operative, Swift, to open its records.
Swift - the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication - links about 7,800 financial institutions around the world, including virtually every major bank and brokerage. It provides banks with instructions on how to transfer funds - instructions which include information on the individuals sending money and the amount of money sent. The treasury department said it had carried out "tens or hundreds" of thousands of name searches on the data. Mr Snow said the programme had been implemented in a "highly responsible" manner, with corporate and external auditors observing the process. In a statement on its website, Swift said: "Swift takes its role as a key infrastructure of the international financial system very seriously and co-operates with authorities to prevent illegal uses of the international financial system. Where required, Swift has to comply with valid subpoenas... Messenger on fire Officials quoted by the newspaper said the programme had helped in the capture of Hambali, blamed for a string of bombings across South East Asia. But some expressed reservations, suggesting it was inappropriate for an urgent, apparently temporary programme to remain in operation for years without formal or congressional authorisation.
Others familiar with the programme told the paper they believed it exploited a "grey area" in the law.
We are disappointed that once again the New York Times has chosen to expose a classified programme that is working to protect Americans
Meanwhile, the New York Times came under fire from the White House for revealing the programme. "We are disappointed that once again the New York Times has chosen to expose a classified programme that is working to protect Americans," said spokeswoman Dana Perino.
But the newspaper's executive editor Bill Keller said: "We remain convinced that the administration's extraordinary access to this vast repository of international financial data, however carefully targeted use of it may be, is a matter of public interest."
|
It's about time that some enterprising Freeper att'y started a class action against the MSM who reveal these secrets. It could be done on behalf of the citizens of the USA because the media dolts have undermined our safety and security. In addition, the leakers who released the info (probable Rat civil servants) to the media should be labeled as "John/Jane Doe" defendants. The ACLU and the sleazeball trial attorneys have hurt us enough. Let's turn the tables!
There's fools, and then there's the stupid NYTimes!!! Damn them!!!
Another disgusting show of partisian news reporting. If Slick $hit was still POTUS in the same scenario, no one would have the slightest inclination to snub their nose at the government's request to please keep this under wrap for the good of all Americans (honest/law abiding ones that is).
Charle Krauthammer said that he heard that John Murtha even tried to get the NYT's not to publish this story.
Not a chance based on past revelations. No gonads.
Signing off for a bit....recommend everyone watch the replay on Fox,..later this evening....
I saw the Markey comment. It was so over the top, the guy is standing alone in the House on it.
This very well could be the straw that broke the camel's back. It sounds like everyone including Murtha knew this one was helping us fight our war on terror.
More than ever, I'm now convinced that we can't win the WOT unless we first take MSM completely out of the equation.
MSM should be shut down for this traitorous behavior and those that leaked the information to them, should be imprisoned for life or given an expedited death penilty.
In fact, these NYTimes dudes are worse cause they're disclosing their country's STATE SECRETS!!! They're worse!!! Plus they're hiding behind a constitution they are simultaneously trying to see destroyed... THEY'RE INSANE!!!
Oh, I think we know who their source is. It's coming right out of the U.S. Senate via Jay Rockefeller. He truly needs to be hung for treason.
What you said! Sometimes it's just hard to say it BAD enough in print.
I'm not sure what all the hoopla on the left is about. My understanding is that the information that the government was analyzing was openly available. It's not like they were tapping phones or spying on anyone. They were crunching numbers and plowing through information available to any central bank through entirely legal channels.
Jane Hall, just tried to defend the NYT's for releasing the story on terrorist and their banking. Even she said it was hard to defend.
I just do not get this one. It is insane.
ACLU Says Government Spying on Bank Records is Further Abuse of Power
Now we know why the NY Times and LA Times went ahead with the publication,....ACLU wanted them to!
************************************************************************
There is a book,:
Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)
*******************************
And a review:
****************************************
Communism is dead. Long live Islam!, September 30, 2004
It sounds absurd: why would Leftists make common cause with a religion that is diametrically opposed to everything the Left stands for? David Horowitz explains that it is really quite logical given the Left's first principle: America is evil and anything or anyone opposed to America is good.
Reviewer:
Kevin Beckman (Sacramento, CA) - See all my reviews
Part I of the book is a brief history of 9/11 through the end of major combat operations in Iraq, and the Left's behavior during this time. Horowitz includes the reaction of Katha Pollitt of The Nation magazine: "The flag stands for vengeance, and jingoism, and war." Anthropology Professor Nicholas De Genova of Columbia University said he hoped for "a million Mogadishus." His colleagues objected, not to the despicable sentiment, but because of the bad publicity it brought their "teach-in." Our tax dollars at work!
Part II is the heart of the book: a history of the American and international Left. Horowitz calls them Neo-Communists or Neocoms. The Neocoms of old believed in the Soviet Union the way religious people believe in God. Those who spied for the USSR didn't see themselves as traitors to their country, but rather loyalists to humanity and an ideal of America that's never existed. When the Soviet Union fell, a few of them stopped for some introspection but most pressed on as if nothing happened. Communist historian Eric Hobsbawm put it nicely: "Without the Revolution, my life and my work are meaningless."
Now that they no longer have to defend an indefensible regime, modern Neocoms are simply nihilists. They know what they oppose but they have no plans for the aftermath of the revolution which they still believe will happen. They don't know what they want, but they know what they hate: the United States, capitalism personified.
So why are they allying with radical Islam? Horowitz says that the Neocoms still believe in Marx's dictum that "religion is the opiate of the masses." Once private property is abolished, the need for religion will vanish, and Islamic radicals will stop being Islamic and radical. The only thing standing in the way is the United States.
Sound insane? It is. They are. I highly recommend this book. Horowitz makes the insanity understandable.
Keller thinks he's f-*&$^*-ing Orvil Dryfoos's ghost, stopping another Cuban Missile Crisis and the Vietnam War and saving the Republic. He doesn't know what a Republic is. Worse, he thinks he represents one.
Keller's a cheese-a**, wimp, Chicken Little, Alger Hiss, Henry Wallace, freedom and America hating commie f*ck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.