Skip to comments.
U.S. Military Intercepts Missile in Test
WAPO ^
| 6-22-06
| AP
Posted on 06/23/2006 4:16:21 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: Peach
Personally, I'd much prefer we just bomb the launch pad, AFPhys.
If you're going to commit an
act of war, then you'd best be ready to fight a war.
Intercepting a missile headed in your direction is one thing, attacking a military target in a sovereign country is entirely something else.
I have no problems with preemption, for the most part, but if you're going to hit one target and start a war, you may as well just hit'em all and fight full-out from the beginning.
Pretty sure that's not really possible, the South wouldn't stand for it.
41
posted on
06/23/2006 11:35:15 AM PDT
by
BARLOCK
To: johnny7
I watched this snippy little turd question Kay Bailey Hutchinson. She sneered almost everytime Sen. Hutchinson made a statement. She is an arrogant, snippy, thoughtless etwas.
42
posted on
06/23/2006 11:37:11 AM PDT
by
tillacum
To: Mannaggia l'America
Instead of Missle-3 interceptor, it should be named
"Right On".
43
posted on
06/23/2006 11:40:09 AM PDT
by
tillacum
To: BARLOCK
For SKorea's sake... I hope she's disappointed.
44
posted on
06/23/2006 12:16:26 PM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: OXENinFLA
The test marked the seventh time in eight attempts the military has successfully shot down a missile target with an interceptor fired from a ship.The Dims and their liberal "scientist" allies have assured us for 25 years that this is not possible.
To: Mannaggia l'America
Note to military: You need to come up with a cooler name for this missile. How 'bout instead of STANDARD Missile, STANDARD Hit-tile?
46
posted on
06/23/2006 1:07:15 PM PDT
by
meandog
(If I were to draw the odious Islamic prophet Muhammad, he would have horns, a tail, and a pitchfork!)
To: coconutt2000
If Congress had acted when Reagan wanted them to, our anti ballistic system would have been up and operational for 10 years.
47
posted on
06/23/2006 1:09:08 PM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson