Skip to comments.
Oh Where, Oh Where is the WMD Coverage?
http://www.gopusa.com ^
| June 22, 2006
| Bobby Eberle
Posted on 06/22/2006 5:12:30 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: driftless
No, billklinton destroyed all the WMDs with his cruise missile strike during Operation Change the Subject...or was it called Operation Prezidue.
21
posted on
06/22/2006 6:29:42 PM PDT
by
Holicheese
(Stanley Cup's new home IS North Carolina!)
To: Solamente
Well, since our enemy has been trying to take over the world since the seventh century they won't quit until they either suceed or we stop them. So I pray it does not take 100,000's of dead. But you could well be right.
To: Solamente
I don't think there will be any wakeup for the left no matter what. It just isn't going to happen. Should there be another 9/11, they will just blame it on "Bush's incompetence."
23
posted on
06/22/2006 6:54:57 PM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: pcottraux
That's true, but still just enough to pierce through any labels tagged on us by the world, and quench the enemy that is half of us within. It will come down to fight fire with fire. We can always say we are sparing our grandchildren from having to deal with the Muslims.
In all intellectual honesty, either we persuade Islam to tone the eF down big time, or we must exterminate them from the human race. "That's All, Folks!"
24
posted on
06/22/2006 7:26:10 PM PDT
by
Solamente
(Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
To: bkepley
According to Khidhir Hamza in Saddam's Bombmaker (pp.333-337), by 1994 Iraq already had an assembled nuclear device "capable of producing a nuclear explosion equivalent to a few kilotons of TNT... What we lacked was a complete nuclear core". (p. 334). He stated they were very close to having a nuclear weapon and that Saddam intended to drop it unannounced on Israel. What I want to know is why we never heard any of this from the MSM. Futhermore, what ever happened to this already assembled device? By the way, this was post '91. Saddam was supposed to destroy all WMDs according to the cease fire that ended Desert Storm. Even as late as Mar. '03 Iraq was negotiating with N. Korea for long range missles. So whether the stuff was pre-Desert Storm or not makes no diffence, Saddam was in violation.
25
posted on
06/22/2006 7:35:58 PM PDT
by
attiladhun2
(evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Where is the coverage on the following:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/sarticle.php?id=10101&o=DIB004 above: every American should read the above book by: Richard Miniter. This is only a partial list of the deadly weapons Richard Miniter reveals in his new book, Disinformation. Miniter systematically dissects the "No-WMD Myth" (how it started, and why it continues), as well as 21 other War-on-Terror myths perpetuated by the media.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/07/iraq.nuclear/
above - 1.77 metric tons of uranium and 1000 and 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" CNN
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872201.stm
above - 1.77 metric tons of uranium and 1000 and 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" BBC
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/mariani/2004/mariani052804.htm above - mortor shell sarin gas
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html above - Roadside Bomb and Mustard gas found FOXNews
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1078&dept_id=151021&newsid=12185667&PAG=461&rfi=9 above - WMDs Found in Iraq Consisted of Cyclosarin By MONIKA SCISLOWSKA, Associated Press Writer ©Indiana Printing & Publishing Co.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112920-5897r.htm above - Iraqi insurgents seek Saddam's chemical arms Washington Times (if the insurgents seek them, then they may know that they are present while are press seems to be naive about it - me). and here is more related to this concern:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39158
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/05/13/sprj.irq.mobile.lab/ above - mobile Bio weapons lab found CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0306/25/se.04.html above - CNN has learned that the Central Intelligence Agency has in its hands the critical parts of a key piece of Iraqi nuclear technology CNN
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html above - I think this is a good read for all Americans
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Programmes/ActionTeam/nwp2.html above: 27 December 2002, IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
http://www.kentimmerman.com/2004_04_25syria.htm above - more interesting reading and here is more from Timmerman:
http://www.kentimmerman.com/2004_04_25wmd.htm
http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/005965.html above - a good essay
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/13/115752.shtml?s=lh Saddam's ambitions are clear
But the final report is this:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-10-06-wmd_x.htm
26
posted on
06/22/2006 7:39:00 PM PDT
by
do the dhue
(I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Ted Kennedy's eyes.)
To: GOP_Proud
"I was surfing to find something about the Miami arrests and happened on Odorman on MSNBC. He's covering it. Called the segment "Santorum Reality Check". Need I say more? Excuse me while I wash my hands. I feel dirty" I saw Pat Buchanon and some black lib- (I didn't get who it was because I was at the gym)-smirking uncontrollably while pretending to offer an unbiased assessment that Rick Santorum has egg on his face over the WMD news conference yesterday.
Their school-girlish analysis was that he was acting out of "desperation" due to being behind in the polls, and he made a terrible political faux pas.
To: pcottraux
According to Kommie Oddball Subversives, Al Qaeda did not really attack the WTC, Bush had the WTC blown up. In other words, many on the Left are in denial that fanatics with a 7th cen. mindset are out to destroy them. More terror attacks will definitely cause the collapse of the Left in this country as it did in Israel. They will still be pains in the a$$, they will just be devoid of political power, which will suit me just fine.
28
posted on
06/22/2006 7:50:08 PM PDT
by
attiladhun2
(evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
To: attiladhun2
Well, setting the wackos aside, if there's another terrorist attack, the left will be able to make the case that Bush failed to prevent another one (since he already had one). Considering the amount of money and effort we spend on security and prevention, that will really make us look foolish.
I'm actually worried that another terrorist attack will have the same effect on America that it had on Spain. It will make people say "What the current president is doing is wrong, let's try a new approach."
29
posted on
06/22/2006 7:59:28 PM PDT
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
We found them Mr. Clinton!
Clinton on Larry King aired 2003.
KING: President, maybe I can get an area where you may disagree. Do you join, President Clinton, your fellow Democrats, in complaining about the portion of the State of the Union address that dealt with nuclear weaponry in Africa?
CLINTON: Well, I have a little different take on it, I think, than either side.
First of all, the White House said -- Mr. Fleischer said -- that on balance they probably shouldn't have put that comment in the speech. What happened, often happens. There was a disagreement between British intelligence and American intelligence. The president said it was British intelligence that said it. And then they said, well, maybe they shouldn't have put it in.
Let me tell you what I know. When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions.
I mean, we're all more sensitive to any possible stocks of chemical and biological weapons. So there's a difference between British -- British intelligence still maintains that they think the nuclear story was true. I don't know what was true, what was false. I thought the White House did the right thing in just saying, Well, we probably shouldn't have said that. And I think we ought to focus on where we are and what the right thing to do for Iraq is now. That's what I think.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson