Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Okay. Now I know wikipedia may not be the best source, but..."The Moors were mainly comprised of Ethiopians, West Africans, Sub-Saharan Africans, Arabs and Berbers."

You cannot tell me Ethiopians are not black. The Moors were a very mixed group, some could have been black, some not so much. The Berbers happened to NOT have very dark skin, but it was still darker than that of the Europeans.

238 posted on 06/22/2006 6:04:12 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: madison10
You are right that wikipedia is a crummy source.

The Columbia Encyclopedia is a bit better.

Moors: nomadic people of the northern shores of Africa, originally the inhabitants of Mauretania. They were chiefly of Berber and Arab stock.

---------------------------------------------

The Berbers happened to NOT have very dark skin, but it was still darker than that of the Europeans.

Which Europeans? There is a lot of diversity there.

Ever seen an Sicilian? About the same shade. Not surprisingly as they are mostly from the same genetic stock.

If you are talking Northern Europeans then yes.

Still does not change the fact that Berbers and Arabs are not black.

272 posted on 06/22/2006 6:18:21 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (The bottom 60% does 40% of the work, the top 40% does 60% of the work. Just who are the "workers"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

Black is a skin color, and not necessarily a "race".


399 posted on 06/22/2006 7:51:25 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson