Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2006 1:31:55 PM PDT by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: new yorker 77
Rove is betting that he can reframe the war in Iraq as a battle between courageous Republicans and pusillanimous Democrats.

When was it ever NOT thus.

2 posted on 06/22/2006 1:36:31 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
The actual war remains one in which people die every day, sometimes in the most gruesome ways, for reasons that aren't entirely clear

As opposed to the wars where weeks and weeks go by with no deaths......

3 posted on 06/22/2006 1:36:49 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Rove is betting that he can reframe the war in Iraq as a battle between courageous Republicans and pusillanimous Democrats.


4 posted on 06/22/2006 1:37:15 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Rove doesn't have to do a thing. Just stand back and watch the dems prove they aren't ready to embrace national security as an important issue.

They're back to teeny tiny issues like school uniforms and V chips. That may have worked for slick willie, but America knows better now.

5 posted on 06/22/2006 1:37:51 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

King of Comedy... Rupert Froomkin.


6 posted on 06/22/2006 1:39:37 PM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Who to put my money on? Froomkin and Shrumm or Rove? Oh, this is sooo hard.


7 posted on 06/22/2006 1:40:32 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
When the Dubai Port debacle broke in the news, I recall soon after polls showing that for the 1st time in a long time if not in history, Democrats were leading as the Party best able to protect the country. Did I see that incorrectly and what are they now saying (the polls)?
10 posted on 06/22/2006 1:46:49 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
The actual war remains one in which people die every day, sometimes in the most gruesome ways, for reasons that aren't entirely clear.

Someone should buy the author of this article a clue. People die every day around the world, sometimes in the most gruesome ways, for reasons that aren't entirely clear. Iraq does not have a corner on the market of human violence and depravity.

11 posted on 06/22/2006 1:50:05 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
The actual war remains one in which people die every day, sometimes in the most gruesome ways, for reasons that aren't entirely clear. -Dan Froomkin

This is one aspect of why our media opinion-makers are doing a disservice. They never believed President Bush when he gave concrete reasons that involve an understanding of how history can be changed by moral action. They pretend not even to understand it. They are rewarded handsomely by praise when their failure to understand makes the President look bad.

13 posted on 06/22/2006 1:51:49 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Rove's RISKY Embrace?

Oh, I don't know, he seems to have somewhat (/sarc) successful in the past when it comes to elections...

14 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("These are not dark days, these are great days." – W. S. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

I love it when the RATS fear the ROVIAN!! LOL!


15 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:06 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

(betting against Rove -- thus far, at least -- has been a sucker's move. )

The author doesn't seem to take his own advice!


16 posted on 06/22/2006 1:57:08 PM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

" pusillanimous Democrats. "

When it comes to Democrats- I believe that it's spelled pussyillanimous.


26 posted on 06/22/2006 2:43:07 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
More fictional scriptwriting from the juvenile media.

If the Dems were smart they would have been supporting this war wholeheartedly, slamming the Islamic cults and Saddam's goons at every turn, supporting US efforts at interrogations and intell efforts, using very supportive language for our soldiers who have been accused of wrongdoing, and taking any complaints to the Pres in private.

They could actually win elections that way.

But they cannot help themselves, their anti-American ideology shines thru very clearly.
27 posted on 06/22/2006 2:49:19 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Translation: Oh me, oh my, Bush isn't governing by polls.


31 posted on 06/22/2006 3:38:42 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

The Dims have lost two straight elections on national security issues. And they can't wait to do it again.


32 posted on 06/22/2006 3:59:53 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson