Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

How would cause a short by hitting the fuel tanks? Then you have already said, the fuel tank was empty and could not explode.

Read the NTSB report, it makes a lot of sense and they don't grasp at straws.


760 posted on 06/27/2006 8:49:04 PM PDT by U S Army EOD (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies ]


To: U S Army EOD

I would not ignore the testimony of hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw TWA 800 shot down by either one or two missiles. That's the strongest evidence in this case and yet it was essentially ignored by the FBI. Don't forget too that initial reports by the NY Times quoted the FBI saying that explosives residues were found on the crash debris. I have my own theory of what actually happened and it's not a fuel tank explosion.


761 posted on 06/27/2006 8:59:26 PM PDT by defenderSD (Just when you think it's never going to happen, that's when it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]

To: U S Army EOD
Lets just assume for a moment that it is possible the fuel tank can explode as shown in the report. But with regard to flight 800 that doesn’t answer the dozens of other questions that took place.

From the witnesses to the corner not able to do the autopsy’s. From the picture that was taken illegally that shown hyper velocity projectiles holes to the confiscated debris that disappeared and the red powder all over the seats (which was NOT glue according to Donaldson.) Last but not least the comment Clinton made in private of the incident.

769 posted on 06/27/2006 9:25:42 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson