Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2006 8:24:24 AM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: genefromjersey
Re: I am researching possible foreign government assistance in the events of 9/11.

I call BS.

2 posted on 06/22/2006 8:26:40 AM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

It was a conspiracy, a vast right wing-neocon conspiracy.


3 posted on 06/22/2006 8:29:16 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

How about navigation? Just buy a Garmin or Lowrance aviation GPS and you can fly a course to anywhere. Once you have a visual on your target you hand fly to the POI. No rocket science here.


4 posted on 06/22/2006 8:30:11 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey
It might have been "relatively simple" to hijack the planes ,and, since some of the hijackers had taken lessons,they could operate aircraft controls to some degree ; but how about the navigation?

I'm no pilot,but I suspect that with the WTC planes,they could have followed the Hudson south,found Manhattan (you can't miss it,I'm told) and from there the towers would be a piece of cake.

5 posted on 06/22/2006 8:30:34 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

VFR navigation is called "pilotage" - it is the art of looking out the friggin' window. Something weather forcasters have never mastered.


7 posted on 06/22/2006 8:34:08 AM PDT by patton (What the heck just happened, here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

IBTZ


8 posted on 06/22/2006 8:34:38 AM PDT by LikeLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

My opinion here:
The planes being relatively modern, most likely just punch in the destination's coordinates in the the autopilot/navigation system.


11 posted on 06/22/2006 8:37:39 AM PDT by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey; darkwing104

IB4TZ first time!


15 posted on 06/22/2006 8:50:01 AM PDT by wjcsux (I would prefer to have the German army in front of me than the French army behind me- Gen. G. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

Disclaimer: I'm a flight simulator geek, not a real pilot. But, some of the addon stuff available for Microsoft Flight Simulator these days is so detailed and accurate, I think the information may hold true.

The four planes that were hijacked--two 757s and two 767s--all have basically the same cockpit layout. (I personally think this is one reason these flights were picked...the 757 and 767 were specifically designed to share a type rating, so if you know one, you can fly the other with minimum fuss.) One of the displays in the cockpit is a navigation display that shows where the plane is along the track programmed into the Flight Management Computer. It also can show nearby radio navigation beacons (VORs and NDBs) and airports.

So, the hijackers get into the cockpit, and sit down. They can look at the navigation display and tell where they are; if they have charts, they can really pinpoint their position and easily figure out a course to fly back to their target, either a straight course or maybe even navigating via radio beacons. It doesn't take a whole lot of advanced planning to figure out "OK, that's KCLE, so we're about 50 miles east of Cleveland, so that means we should steer about 090 to head toward Washington, that's close enough and we'll fine-tune it later," especially if they actually brought some enroute charts along. They can even dial a course and altitude into the autopilot and let the plane fly itself while they plan more. Then once they get close, they start descending and pick up the target visually.

They didn't need a grand conspiracy. All they needed was some reading material, a little flying practice, and the willingness to do it.

}:-)4


16 posted on 06/22/2006 8:54:01 AM PDT by Moose4 (Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

I can tell you that from a Cessna 152 on up through a '67, navigating the aircraft from wherever they gained control to visually acquiring their targets was essentially a "no-brainer".

Whether they used the Mark-1 eyeball, hand-held Garmin GPS, LORAN, on-board instrumentation, whatever, getting to visual range was nothing.

Sadly, actaully hitting the targets after sighting them was some decent stick and rudder flying.

Morbidly, on MS Flight Simulator, with the good scenery data, you could practice hitting major landmarks over and over.


17 posted on 06/22/2006 8:54:18 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

I have always said to those whom come up with mystical equations for 9/11... The reason they chose 9/11 was that is was VFR in most of the country..

(VFR=Visual Flight Rules=You can SEE where your going....)


21 posted on 06/22/2006 9:01:27 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey
Yep. All you gotta do is look out the window. Remember, only two fo the four planes made it to their primary target, the two tallest buildings in the world, on a severe clear day.

One was supposed to hit the White House, but the scumbags couldn't find it, so they settled for the largest building that they could identify. (The Pentagon, by the way is the largest building in the world.)

The fourth, of course didn't make it anywhere 'cept the ground.

If you're looking for some wacky aviation conspiracy, give it up.

23 posted on 06/22/2006 9:26:54 AM PDT by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey

OK folks, you answered my questions-very clearly- and I appreciate your input and assistance.

I'm sure some of you might think the questions were stupid-which they were-but I'd rather ask friends a dumb question than climb out on a limb with a saw in my hand.

Happy flying to you all !


25 posted on 06/22/2006 12:06:09 PM PDT by genefromjersey (So much to flame;so little time !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey
What sort of outside assistance (if any) would have been needed ? What form do you think it would have taken ?

Absolutely none. Charts of navaids are published, GPS is common, and the navigation skills can be learned in a simulator, if not in the aircraft they trained in.

Your help would be greatly appreciated,as I am researching possible foreign government assistance in the events of 9/11.

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

26 posted on 06/22/2006 12:10:16 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: genefromjersey
If you did a little research, they practiced on flights into New York with smaller aircraft and on commercial flight. This act was planned well in advanced and worked out in detail.

The fools didn't count on passengers fighting back over PA. Now the passengers aren't taking any chances.


28 posted on 06/22/2006 3:20:59 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson