To: RasterMaster
Not with regard to the yellowcake, it isn't. I don't know why so many refuse to acknowledge the undisputed facts about this material, but those facts are: (1) we knew Iraq had yellowcake, (2) they were ALLOWED to have yellowcake, (3) the material in question was tagged by the IAEA, and the tags were in place when we first arrived at Tuwaitha, and (4) that material is about 94% shy of the enrichment level necessary for use in a nuclear weapon.
Saying that these tons of radioactive material were a violation of the cease-fire or of any international agreement or sanction involving Iraq is just wrong.
54 posted on
06/22/2006 6:56:13 AM PDT by
lugsoul
(Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
To: lugsoul
Only ONE individual mentioned yellowcake out of 65 posts pertinent to the WMD issues as a whole and the FACT that their existence PROVES Saddam broke the cease fire agreement by LYING, NOT DESTROYING WMD HE CLAIMED TOP HAVE DESTROYED and that is the one post you latch onto and rant about. That's amazingly narrow minded, especially since you ignored the facts in his regime's own paperwork that Saddam was actively seeking a nuke program.
72 posted on
06/22/2006 7:13:31 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(One presidential visit to Baghdad is worth 1000 pathetic declarations of defeat from the left)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson