Skip to comments.
Addicted to Regulation - The real reason for America's foreign-oil dependence
Opinion Journal, WSG ^
| 21 June 2006
| Pete DuPont
Posted on 06/21/2006 7:37:08 PM PDT by ChessExpert
In his State of the Union Address, President Bush said that "America is addicted to oil." But it would be more accurate to say that America is addicted to opportunity, and oil and its products help us seize it.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: dupont2008; economy; energy; petedupont
To: ChessExpert
Dupont, BP Join to Produce Biofuels
http://www.comcast.net/news/finance/index.jsp?cat=FINANCE&fn=/2006/06/20/417620.html
Like ethanol, butanol is an alcohol compound, but with four carbon atoms instead of two. DuPont officials said the different chemical structure of butanol gives it several advantages over ethanol, including tolerance to water contamination, facilitating transportation via pipeline.
The U.S. fuel market has been constrained by the fact that ethanol, which attracts water molecules and therefore tends to corrode pipelines, must be transported on trucks, trains and bargest in relatively small batches to storage terminals where it is then blended with gasoline.
Another advantage of biobutanol, officials said, is that it can be blended into gasoline at higher concentrations than ethanol without the need to retrofit vehicles, and it offers better fuel economy than gasoline-ethanol blends.
2
posted on
06/21/2006 7:49:08 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: P-40
By doing a very little bit of reading, I believe that butanol production is technically more complicated than ethanol. I can brew ethanol in my shed while butanol eludes my technical capability.
To: Citizen Tom Paine
I can brew ethanol in my shed while butanol eludes my technical capability.
It does sound fairly complex...and the product is probably not drinkable. :)
On the plus side, the final product sounds so much easier to work with. Ethanol is a pain in the rear.
4
posted on
06/21/2006 7:56:41 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: ChessExpert
Some key points from the article:
The problem is that America's domestic petroleum production has significantly declined, from 10 million barrels a day in 1970 to about 5 million today. Our response has been increasing importation of oil, now more than 12 million barrels a day.
our country's political establishment, from Congress to the press and the presidency, has worked for a quarter century to prevent increases in our energy supply
In 1990 the first President Bush issued a presidential directive forbidding access to about 85% of Outer Continental Shelf oil and natural gas reserves. In 1998 President Clinton extended the moratorium through 2012
the U.S. "is the only nation in the world that has placed a significant amount of its potential domestic energy supplies off-limits."
Congress has also limited the capacity to refine our oil. After Hurricane Katrina, a bill to streamline the refinery permitting process--we have not built a new one since 1976--and encourage the building of refineries on closed military bases was blocked in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee when every Democratic senator, along with Jim Jeffords (I., Vt) and Lincoln Chaffee (R., R.I.) voted "no."
5
posted on
06/21/2006 7:57:01 PM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(Why aren't lawyers ever accused of price gouging?)
To: ChessExpert
We are the puppets. Congress is the puppetteer. They like to watch us dance and squirm. All they can accomplish is pulling our strings.
I would like to re-arrange congress like a Mr Potatohead.
Common sense seems to be almost non-existant in congress.
Time for a change.
6
posted on
06/21/2006 8:20:44 PM PDT
by
o_zarkman44
(ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!.)
To: Citizen Tom Paine
Hope that butanol doesn't smell anything like buteric acid.
7
posted on
06/21/2006 8:21:15 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
Well, that would certainly make leaks easier to find!
The problem is that the smell of buytric acid tends to make people puke...
8
posted on
06/21/2006 8:29:59 PM PDT
by
RebelBanker
(If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
To: RebelBanker
The mafia used buteric acid to punish dry cleaners, and others, that were late with the protection money.
9
posted on
06/21/2006 8:32:52 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
10
posted on
06/21/2006 8:36:33 PM PDT
by
RebelBanker
(If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
To: RebelBanker
Yup...would permeate the cement floor which would have to be broken up and removed. Very effective enforcement. Happened to an uncle in the thirties.
11
posted on
06/21/2006 8:40:27 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: o_zarkman44
The vermin entrenched in DC KNOW they have three "legal" ways to control votes.
1. Taxes/expenditures. They decide how much of our hard earned cash we can keep.
2. Access to energy. They decide, via regulation, what can be drilled for and where, how much can be refined, if - when - and where nuclear plants are built, what the air and water quality surrounding coal burning plants are, etc. etc.
3. Representation. Thanks to McCain-Feingold, your input is no longer needed, thank you very much! Just send us your taxes, we will let you know what you need. And what you will receive from your benevolent leaders.
It all starts with #1. Take them out of the loop and put them on a budget. It's time for us to tell them how much we'll let them have to spend.
Eliminate income taxes and return the election of senators to state legislatures. The founders had it right!
12
posted on
06/21/2006 9:07:11 PM PDT
by
hotshu
To: RebelBanker
P U!
I've been to that website before. Wait...that is a P....
13
posted on
06/22/2006 5:55:46 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: FReepaholic
I've heard about the congressional block to streamline new production facilities, but I've seen very little data (ironically, I work for a major oil player, but on the transshipment side) indicating why this was done. Have you heard the justification behind this maneuver?
BTB, if you're following oil issues, the quote about no new refineries is misleading- there are no NEW facilities, but exisiting facilities have expanded greatly... and, seeing as they're clumped together, one hurricane can do a lot of damage to national infrastructure (another matter entirely).
If you want to blame someone, blame the EPA. They've ultimately given the pass to proposed new refinery plants, citing air quality concerns.
Wish we could outsource the EPA to India.
14
posted on
06/26/2006 4:16:13 PM PDT
by
capt.P
(Hold Fast! Strong Hand Uppermost!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson