To: governsleastgovernsbest; bentfeather; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; John Valentine; ...
City of Evil bump:
To: Behind Liberal Lines
If they be radical right wing judges, then make the most of it!
3 posted on
06/21/2006 7:39:45 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I saw Ithaca and knew this was crapola. Read Coloring the News. It will vindicate any thoughts you had about media.
4 posted on
06/21/2006 7:41:27 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
radical right-wing judges appointed by recent presidents Presidents?
What right wing radical judges were appointed by Bill Clinton?
5 posted on
06/21/2006 7:42:10 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
("I don't think Pat Kennedy is crazy, he's just a drunk" -- G. Gordon Liddy (5-10-06))
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Gannett is run by anti-American liberals.
The cartoonist in my local paper Matt Davies is from England or Ireland, whatever.
He won a Peabody for his hate-filled anti-Bush, anti-military, anti-conservative cartoons.
Meanwhile sales of 'The Journal News' have steadily plummeted.
6 posted on
06/21/2006 7:45:56 PM PDT by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Matt Davies Cartoon
7 posted on
06/21/2006 7:54:06 PM PDT by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Seems that respect for the language and intent of the Constitution -- as well as regard for personal liberty and the right to property -- makes someone a "right wing radical".
Sheesh!
8 posted on
06/21/2006 8:08:01 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
radical right-wing judges appointed by recent presidents Recent President? Do they think Ruth Bader Ginsberg is a Radical Right Wing Judge?
Hmm.
Of course their definition of "Radical Right Wing Judge" is one who goes to the text of the Constitution first, not Scottish law, or emanations from the penumbra of the Constitution. Only if the text is unclear, and I can't think of anywhere that it is, do they look to precedent, or even Common Law. ( Which is nothing more than English precedent anyway).
10 posted on
06/21/2006 9:46:15 PM PDT by
El Gato
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
