Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
So you cannot see how creationism in that post (29) is considered to be the antithesis of science, observation, etc? To my understanding that means the growth of creationism, in this person's view, spells the "doom" of science.

Whatever. I poke fun at that kind of hyperventilation just like you poke fun at words denoting the judgments and activities of God.
294 posted on 06/21/2006 1:05:50 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew

"To my understanding that means the growth of creationism, in this person's view, spells the "doom" of science.
"

The person who wrote that marriage simply dismissed the impact of creationism on the sciences. He didn't predict that it would be the "doom" of science at all. He just said that science would ignore it. And that's exactly what science does. It ignores supernatural stuff. It can't study it, so it is simply ignored.


298 posted on 06/21/2006 1:08:44 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson