To: MineralMan
So you cannot see how creationism in that post (29) is considered to be the antithesis of science, observation, etc? To my understanding that means the growth of creationism, in this person's view, spells the "doom" of science.
Whatever. I poke fun at that kind of hyperventilation just like you poke fun at words denoting the judgments and activities of God.
To: Fester Chugabrew
"To my understanding that means the growth of creationism, in this person's view, spells the "doom" of science.
"
The person who wrote that marriage simply dismissed the impact of creationism on the sciences. He didn't predict that it would be the "doom" of science at all. He just said that science would ignore it. And that's exactly what science does. It ignores supernatural stuff. It can't study it, so it is simply ignored.
298 posted on
06/21/2006 1:08:44 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson