Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution: World science academies fight back against creationists
PhysOrg.com ^ | 21 June 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/21/2006 8:33:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

In a veiled attack on creationism, the world's foremost academies of science on Wednesday called on parents and teachers to provide children with the facts about evolution and the origins of life on Earth.

A declaration signed by 67 national academies of science blasted the scriptural teaching of biology as a potential distortion of young minds.

"In various parts of the world, within science courses taught in certain public systems of education, scientific evidence, data and testable theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied or confused with theories not testable by science," the declaration said.

"We urge decision-makers, teachers and parents to educate all children about the methods and discoveries of science and to foster an understanding of the science of nature.

"Knowledge of the natural world in which they live empowers people to meet human needs and protect the planet."

Citing "evidence-based facts" derived from observation, experiment and neutral assessment, the declaration points to findings that the Universe is between 11 and 15 billion years old, and the Earth was formed about 4.5 billion years ago.

Life on Earth appeared at least 2.5 billion years ago as a result of physical and chemical processes, and evolved into the species that live today.

"Commonalities in the structure of the genetic code of all organisms living today, including humans, clearly indicate their common primordial origin," it said.

Signatories of the declaration include the US National Academy of Sciences, Britain's Royal Society, the French Academy of Sciences and their counterparts in Canada, China, Germany, Iran, Israel and Japan and elsewhere.
The statement does not name any names or religions, nor does it explain why it fears the teaching of evolution or the scientific explanation for the origins of planetary life are being sidelined.

It comes, however, in the context of mounting concern among biologists about the perceived influence of creationism in the United States.

Evangelical Christians there are campaigning hard for schools to teach creationism or downgrade evolution to the status of one of a competing group of theories about the origins of life on Earth.

According to the website Christian Post (www.christianpost.com), an opinion poll conducted in May by Gallop found that 46 percent of Americans believe that God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years or so.

Scientists say hominids emerged around six million years ago and one of their offshoots developed into anatomically modern man, Homo sapiens, about 200,000 years ago, although the timings of both events are fiercely debated.

Nearly every religion offers an explanation as to how life began on Earth.

Fundamentalist Christians insist on a literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis in the Bible, in which God made the world in seven days, culminating in the creation of the first two humans, Adam and Eve.

A variation of this is called "intelligent design" which acknowledges evolution but claims that genetic mutations are guided by God's hand rather than by Charles Darwin's process of natural selection.

US President George W. Bush said last August that he believed in this concept and that he supported its teaching in American schools.

The academies' statement says that science does not seek to offer judgements of value or morality, and acknowledges limitations in current knowledge.

"Science is open-ended and subject to correction and expansion as new theoretical and empirical understanding emerges," it adds.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: allahdoodit; bewareofluddites; bewareofyeccult; creationbashing; crevolist; evozealots; factsvsoogabooga; fsmlovesyou; goddooditamen; ignoranceisstrength; nonscientists; pavlovian; sciencevsfairytales; superstitiouskooks; yecidiots; youngearthcultists; zeusdoodit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 641-646 next last
To: Dumpster Baby

"If any of my dead relatives came knocking on my door, I would instantly become a hard core true believer"

Howdy Dumpster Baby;

This is just one man's testimony of what happened to him in a NDE...there are thousands of other testimonies from folks that have gotten a tiny glimpse of eternity.

Just follow the links:

Saved From Hell
Rev. Howard Storm's near-death experience

Before his near-death experience, Rev. Howard Storm, a Professor of Art at Northern Kentucky University, was not a very pleasant man. He was an avowed atheist and was hostile to every form of religion and those who practiced it.

He often would use rage to control everyone around him and he didn't find joy in anything. Anything that wasn't seen, touched, or felt, he had no faith in. He knew with certainty that the material world was the full extent of everything that was. He considered all belief systems associated with religion to be fantasies for people to deceive themselves with. Beyond what science said, there was nothing else.

On June 1, 1985, at the age of 38, Howard Storm had a near-death experience due to a perforation of the stomach and his life was forever changed.

His near-death experience is one of the most profound, if not the most profound, afterlife experience I have ever documented.

His life was so immensely changed after his near-death experience that he resigned as a professor and devoted his time to attending the United Theological Seminary to become a United Church of Christ minister.

The following is the account of Pastor Howard Storm's near-death experience, which is an excerpt from his book, My Descent Into Death, reprinted by permission.

http://www.near-death.com/storm.html


561 posted on 06/22/2006 5:34:23 PM PDT by Ready2go (Isa 5:20 Destruction is certain for those who say that evil is good and good is evil;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Pure nonsense.

Well then the next question should be easy for a man of your talents.

Here's the proposition:

Life on Earth arose from inorganic matter.

How can that be falsified?

562 posted on 06/22/2006 5:52:24 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Life on Earth arose from inorganic matter.

Are you suggesting that scientists believe the first living things contained no carbon?

563 posted on 06/22/2006 6:22:08 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Not my intent.

Let's try this proposition.

Life on Earth arose from non-living matter.

Much broader in scope.

How would that proposition be falsified?

564 posted on 06/22/2006 6:34:29 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: js1138

And FWIW, the term inorganic does not exclude carbon but I got your drift.


565 posted on 06/22/2006 6:36:45 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Define non-living.


566 posted on 06/22/2006 6:37:00 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Come on now, I was nice enough the first time. Your suggestion that carbon was excluded from inorganic matter was wrong. I overlooked it in the interest of finding a test that falsifies abiogenesis as the source of life on Earth.

But I'll be a nice guy. You can define life as the consensus criteria cited by most scientists. Non life will be defined as matter not satisfying all those criteria. The criteria is yours to choose.

You claimed my claim is nonsense. Unless I see some attempt to falsify the proposition it will be evident who is steeped in nonsense.

567 posted on 06/22/2006 6:46:33 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Life on Earth arose from non-living matter. Much broader in scope. How would that proposition be falsified?

By showing that life on earth had origins from outer space, you know, like aliens landed here.

568 posted on 06/22/2006 6:50:19 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields

You got pictures?


569 posted on 06/22/2006 6:51:12 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
What has God done that is bad or ugly?


570 posted on 06/22/2006 6:55:30 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Thank you for retracting your claim.


571 posted on 06/22/2006 7:00:02 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields

LOL. Since you have no pictures you must have a test for the aliens. I'm very interested in that test but I'm even more interested in how you prove that life didn't come from non-life on Earth 4 billion years ago. I suppose if you hired enough illegal aliens and sent them through a time warp they could watch every nook and cranny of early Earth but man that's a lot of illegal aliens.


572 posted on 06/22/2006 7:15:05 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
LOL. Since you have no pictures you must have a test for the aliens. I'm very interested in that test but I'm even more interested in how you prove that life didn't come from non-life on Earth 4 billion years ago. I suppose if you hired enough illegal aliens and sent them through a time warp they could watch every nook and cranny of early Earth but man that's a lot of illegal aliens.

Nice duck. You chastised us for not stating how the hypothesis could be falsified and I told you how. Please admit your error.

573 posted on 06/22/2006 7:24:14 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields
You told me nothing. The conjecture is unfalsifiable. To falsify the proposition that life came from non-life Omahafields would have to have observed every chemical reaction in the universe since t=0+. Your attempt at falsification simply widened the field. I'll leave that for you as an exercise to figure out why.

When you do, I'll expect you to return....

Humbly.

574 posted on 06/22/2006 8:19:18 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields

Oh yeah, you'll need more illegal aliens, the universe is a big place and 15 billion years is a lot of ground to cover.


575 posted on 06/22/2006 8:29:18 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I see what you are saying but what does that have to do with the theory of evolution?
576 posted on 06/22/2006 8:31:01 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields

ok and?


577 posted on 06/22/2006 8:31:34 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: OmahaFields
Nothing, I never mentioned the ToE. The article above states the proposition I offered as more than conjecture, it offered it as fact. That's how this line of friendly banter got started. Scientists castigating creationists for not doing good science doing bad science.

I see humor in stuff like that and so I like to point it out so others can join me in a chuckle.

578 posted on 06/22/2006 8:35:04 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

theories about the origins and evolution of life on Earth are being concealed, denied or confused with theories not testable by science," the declaration said.

Hey guys, let me know who wins after you hash all this stuff out.


579 posted on 06/22/2006 8:42:48 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
This is really funny. Right-wing google inserting creationist ads into physics.org page.

Creation Or Evolution? - Is evolution just a theory? You can prove creation. Order free booklet.

Sponsored Links (Ads by Google)

580 posted on 06/22/2006 8:51:26 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 641-646 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson