Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter has it right on the widows of 9/11
Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| 06/21/2006
| By Alan Caruba
Posted on 06/21/2006 7:32:18 AM PDT by oxcart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: oxcart
Wow, this article appeared in the Stinquierer? Simply amazing! There are going to be some tightly-wadded panties in Chestnut Hill tonight!
61
posted on
06/21/2006 8:40:16 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals -- regardless of party.)
To: MaDuce
If that was the Qur'an they were throwing in the fire, I might actually support book burning.
62
posted on
06/21/2006 8:40:51 AM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: RonDog
LOL, thanks love the photos.
63
posted on
06/21/2006 8:45:06 AM PDT
by
oxcart
(Journalism [Sic])
To: RonDog
64
posted on
06/21/2006 8:49:42 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: beckett
"Gorelick has suffered even more ignominy recently, as a investigative report on Fannie Mae shows that she came away from her short tenure there as general counsel with over $15 million, while Clinton appointee Franklin Raines, the ousted former chief executive of Fannie Mae, received over $90 million in compensation while he headed the semi-autonomous, government sponsored mortgage loan company. The report indicates that Raines cooked the books to show higher profits, justifying the exorbitant bonuses he, Gorelick, and other execs paid themselves."
Reminds me of a joke I read recently in the WSJ. What's the difference between Enron and Fannie Mae?
The Enron folks have been convicted.
65
posted on
06/21/2006 8:51:15 AM PDT
by
Montfort
(Check out the 200+ page free preview of The Figurehead by Thomas Larus at lulu.com/larus)
To: laissez- faire
These women exploited their husbands death for their own personal gain. I found them disgusting long before Ann's book came out. Ann tells it like it is and some people can't handle the truth.
To: oxcart
LOL, thanks love the photos.
You're welcome!
Here is ANOTHER wonderful new picture of Ann that you might not have seen yet...
...from that "Tonight Show "PHOTO thread
67
posted on
06/21/2006 8:55:59 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: oxcart
thanks for posting the working link and also giving me the how-to to do so -
so, I am going to test it now to see if I understand how?
per the "posting HTML" instructions on the posting page, by NOT using ANY html instructions in the post, it will automatically convert to html when posted - including into paragraphs...
here goes
http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/
68
posted on
06/21/2006 8:56:12 AM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time>")
To: GrandEagle
... the Jersey Girls; but as far as I know, they are exercising political dissent.
Actually, the Jersey Girls are practicing partisan politics. They actively campaigned for Kerry vs Bush. Part of that was their grandstanding at the 9/11 Hearings. This isn't illegal or immoral but it is what it is.
Sheehan, on the other hand is exercising political dissent. It's different.
But I agree with your observation that the lunatic b!tch Sheehan certainly is seditious if not treasonous. Neither of which will get her in front of a judge.
69
posted on
06/21/2006 8:56:54 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: maine-iac7
It worked, it worked!
Thank you Oxcart
70
posted on
06/21/2006 8:57:20 AM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time>")
To: Beckwith
astute observation. - Thanks
To: Ultra Sonic 007
72
posted on
06/21/2006 9:02:49 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Once you see the MSM manipulate opinion, all their efforts seem manipulative-Reformedliberal)
To: oxcart; All
I
just "unveiled" the first iteration of a new graphic. It was originally conceived to illustrate my view of Ann Coulter's "Jersey Widows", but it works just as well for Cindy Sheehan, Daniel Berg, the Columbine crowd, and all other gun-grabbers. And, IMO, it also is apropos re the present "dancing on the graves" of our two slaughtered and defiled heroes.
Copyright 2006 Microlithic Technologies
(Does anyone know a "real artist" [as opposed to a graphics technician/hacker like me] who might want to take this concept and "run with it" -- as in a political cartoon...?)
73
posted on
06/21/2006 9:05:28 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah" = Satan in disguise)
To: oxcart
Does anyone know if Rush Limbaugh ever talk about this on this show?
74
posted on
06/21/2006 9:07:12 AM PDT
by
Fawn
(BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
To: Joan Kerrey
>I think that would have exposed Dem strategy far in advance of Ann's book
Sure, to people like us.
Now everyone else knows, too.
75
posted on
06/21/2006 9:30:31 AM PDT
by
dinasour
(Pajamahadeen and member of the Head SnowFlake Committee)
To: oxcart
This is a joke, right. There is no way the far-left censures at the Philadelphia Inquirer would have allowed this column to be printed. LOL! Love it!
To: dmz
"Is that a stain on her blue dress?"
Maybe but, surely nothing directly to do with President Reagan.
How could this marvelous young female conservative not be excited to actually meet the Gipper ?!?!
77
posted on
06/21/2006 10:12:19 AM PDT
by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: maine-iac7
78
posted on
06/21/2006 10:24:19 AM PDT
by
oxcart
(Journalism [Sic])
To: Fawn
Yes, Rush talked about it on Monday I think. He said that the Jersey Girls were fair game just like Nick Burgs father was for going over the line politically.
79
posted on
06/21/2006 10:28:15 AM PDT
by
oxcart
(Journalism [Sic])
To: dinasour
The reason the Dims are really mad, is that little trick isn't going to work so well any more.Exactly. Neither Hillary nor any of the rest of the 'rats could care less whether the jersey girls live or die. But the scam of attributing "moral authority" to designated victims has a long and blighted history. Now Ann has busted the scam, and the 'rats are unhinged.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson