To: Brilliant
IMO, the parks system is really run for the benefit of the people running the parks and not the visitors. If they had less visitors it would be fine by them.
7 posted on
06/21/2006 4:53:00 AM PDT by
Thebaddog
(Labs Rules! Brilliant!)
To: Thebaddog
You are right.........The above article ran in our local rag, and directly next to it was a puff piece on how the Feds were changing the rules on parks to eliminate "recreational uses" in favor of "conservation". In other words, elimination of vehicles and snowmobiles in favor of the tree-huggers. Now they bitch because there is no money. I would suggest that they charge the tree-huggers more to "experience nature".
16 posted on
06/21/2006 5:50:46 AM PDT by
newcthem
(When are our congress-men going to start getting paid in Pesos?)
To: Thebaddog
IMO, the parks system is really run for the benefit of the people running the parks and not the visitors. If they had less visitors it would be fine by them.You nailed it.
18 posted on
06/21/2006 6:16:03 AM PDT by
Inyo-Mono
(Life is like a cow pasture, it's hard to get through without stepping in some mess. NRA.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson