Replies

I asked you to back up that charge yesterday, and you couldn't. It's nice to know you don't mind being labeled a liar now as well.

Yawn. What "charge"? That you drew all of your information from mainstream media which, in turn, based their stories on a press-release put out by the homo-promo group which is at the center of all this? Here are the facts. Do you deny any of these?

1.) A little boy was beaten up at school by several other children.

2.) The attack took place out of sight of teachers on the second anniversary of Fake Marriage Day in Massachusetts.

3.) The little boy in question is the son of a man who is being attacked by the school district and local homo-promo groups for resisting the "gay" agenda.

We are left to infer whether these things are in any way related. The homo-promo group has gone to great lengths to make it appear the fight was unrelated to their conflicts with the boy's parents. I'm not so sure.

You, on the other hand, have been 100% sure from the get-go, based completely on the spin offered by the homo community and their supporters. If that's what you call 'research', I think you need to go back to the drawing board.

What charge? Are these or are these not your words? Why, yes. Yes, they are.

You post articles based on an attack press-release put out by the homo group at the center of this controversy and call it 'truth'?

So, liar, I'm still waiting for you to show us the link that I posted that is from a homosexual group. tick tock

Here are the facts. Do you deny any of these?

1.) A little boy was beaten up at school by several other children.

I deny that, given the story by the school backed up by the playground aids that it was a simple fight between two boys who are actually friends. But perhaps you or Parker (who also posts here) can name a few of these "bullies" and their families who promoted this attack?

3.) The little boy in question is the son of a man who is being attacked by the school district and local homo-promo groups for resisting the "gay" agenda.

He is the son of Parker. Not sure what attack by the school district you are referring to. Parker is the one who initiated the lawsuit.

We are left to infer whether these things are in any way related. The homo-promo group has gone to great lengths to make it appear the fight was unrelated to their conflicts with the boy's parents. I'm not so sure.

We don't need to infer anything before looking at all of the reports. Which homo-promo group has had anything to say that was not already stated by the police chief and the school and district administration?

You, on the other hand, have been 100% sure from the get-go, based completely on the spin offered by the homo community and their supporters. If that's what you call 'research', I think you need to go back to the drawing board.

And your "research" was what? At least a few of us looked at all of the articles and press releases before debunking this original story. You were taken in hook, line, and sinker, but only because that's what you wanted to believe. So much for research, huh?