Official says father's view on gays didn't spark fight (David Parker insulted by Superintendent)

Boston Globe ^ | June 20, 2006 | Maria Sacchetti

[MACVSOG68]

Truth? You post articles based on an attack press-release put out by the homo group at the center of this controversy and call it 'truth'?

It truly is scary how many people are so easily taken in by the propaganda of the "gay" left.

I am officially dubbing this the Nifong approach to justice.

[Peach]

The Estabrook authorities, for whom "diversity" is part of a paycheck, called the police on Parker.

What should they have done, since he refused to leave the school after the meeting and the school was locking up?

Moreover, Parker's lawyer is calling for a private resolution; that is, the school should drop the restraining order, which has become a pivotal point.

Oh, I'll just bet Parker would love a private resolution, since he doesn't have a leg to stand on and his lies would be exposed in a court of law.

It looks to me like some of the "anti-Parker activists" cited in the above article have found their way over to FR.

Oh, yes. I've been posting for 8 years just so I could finally, for the first time ever, come on a homosexual activism thread. If you can't argue without making stuff up, you must not have a terribly good argument in the first place.

[Ignatz]

...said Superintendent Paul Ash . ``Some adults are exploiting these children for political purposes."

So is teaching acceptance of the gay agenda, but you seem fine with that, Paul "Freekin' Hypocrite" Ash-wipe.

[Antoninus]

The left must be just delighted that freepers have given up doing actual research in favor of attacking other freepers.

This is a clear-cut case of he-said-she-said. I choose to believe and support the family who is being victimized. You choose to believe the school district, local media, and a homosexual propaganda group which is apparently running the show in Lexington. Good for you.

[Peach]

You post articles based on an attack press-release put out by the homo group at the center of this controversy and call it 'truth'?

I asked you to back up that charge yesterday, and you couldn't. It's nice to know you don't mind being labeled a liar now as well.

[Peach]

Not that I should bother responding to a now fully exposed liar but in order to believe your sequence of events, one must believe that the following people are lying:

1. The children interviewed.
2. The aides and teachers who were on the playground that day.
3. The Superintendent of Schools.
4. The Police.
5. Children's Services
6. The DA

I'm sure there are more. That's just off the top of my head.

[webstersII]

"And since he'll be outnumbered, teach him to crush a trachea or snap fingers and wrists. "

Please . . . lay off the caffeine.

[Antoninus]

What should they have done, since he refused to leave the school after the meeting and the school was locking up?

Maybe treated him with respect, acknowledged that his complaints had merit, and done something about them? Nahhh. Let's just call the cops.

Oh, I'll just bet Parker would love a private resolution, since he doesn't have a leg to stand on and his lies would be exposed in a court of law.

What, are you saying that parents shouldn't have a right to protect their children from classroom homosexual propaganda in kindergarden?

Oh, yes. I've been posting for 8 years just so I could finally, for the first time ever, come on a homosexual activism thread.

Who said I was referring specifically to you? You're just a johnny-come-lately on these threads. In your case, I can only assume a massive brain infarction. The people you're lining up with to attack the Parkers are trolls who will one day explode and be zotted.

[Peach]

You see to be unaware of the articles I posted that said all the parents, including Parker, were given assurances about what would be taught in the classroom.

Parker refused to leave when the school officials couldn't give him the same assurance that nothing regarding the homosexual agenda would be discussed on the playground.

You'll have to point out where I've said that I support anything about the homosexual agenda. Just one post would do. I'll wait. (Before you waste too much of your time, if your reading comprehension is at a 5th grade level, you'll note where I've on and off for years talked about how the radical gay agenda is abhorrent.)

Oh, and as to being zotted and calling those of us who don't believe a word Parker is saying about his arrest or the gang and adult-supported beating of his son trolls, give it your best shot.

[Peach]

You post articles based on an attack press-release put out by the homo group at the center of this controversy and call it 'truth'?

Oh, and I've been waiting for two days for you to back up this charge that you've made twice now.

But hey, it's up to you. Provided you don't mind being labeled a liar if you can't back up your charge.

[Antoninus]

I asked you to back up that charge yesterday, and you couldn't. It's nice to know you don't mind being labeled a liar now as well.

Yawn. What "charge"? That you drew all of your information from mainstream media which, in turn, based their stories on a press-release put out by the homo-promo group which is at the center of all this? Here are the facts. Do you deny any of these?

1.) A little boy was beaten up at school by several other children.

2.) The attack took place out of sight of teachers on the second anniversary of Fake Marriage Day in Massachusetts.

3.) The little boy in question is the son of a man who is being attacked by the school district and local homo-promo groups for resisting the "gay" agenda.

We are left to infer whether these things are in any way related. The homo-promo group has gone to great lengths to make it appear the fight was unrelated to their conflicts with the boy's parents. I'm not so sure.

You, on the other hand, have been 100% sure from the get-go, based completely on the spin offered by the homo community and their supporters. If that's what you call 'research', I think you need to go back to the drawing board.

[Antoninus]

Provided you don't mind being labeled a liar if you can't back up your charge.

Being labeled a "liar" by a petty forum geek who wouldn't know the truth if it hit him in the back of the head is of no concern to me. I'm content to let my posts speak for themselves. Why don't you do likewise, rather than simply declaring people you disagree with to be "liars"?

[Antoninus]

You'll have to point out where I've said that I support anything about the homosexual agenda. Just one post would do.

Hey, the communists had their useful idiots, too. On this issue, you've been quite useful.

[Peach]

What charge? Are these or are these not your words? Why, yes. Yes, they are.

You post articles based on an attack press-release put out by the homo group at the center of this controversy and call it 'truth'?

So, liar, I'm still waiting for you to show us the link that I posted that is from a homosexual group. tick tock

[Peach]

So yet another lie you've made about me that you can't back up.

You've been outted as a liar on this thread twice now. Maybe you can go for the record and make it three times.

[BritExPatInFla]

If some idiotic teacher gave my child "Heather Has Two Mommies" or some similar garbage, I don't know what I'd do.

Explain that there are different people in the world, who do different things? Explain that maybe we don't agree with what they do? Let's not forget that the perpetrator of the crime was the teacher/school/super/school committe, not the parent. Parker's reaction was remarkably restrained.

Parker was asked to leave, he reused, he trespassed. What 'crime' did the "teacher/school/super/school committe" commit? You're letting a political view cloud the facts. The kid got in a fight. Parker didn't bring this to light in a timely manner. Parker looks like he's either playing politics with it, and/or an attention whore.

[DBeers]

Oh, no, freepers are having too much fun denigrating other freepers who don't think EXACTLY what they think.

Actually only a few like YOU are attempting to denigrate other freepers who don't think EXACTLY what they think. They repeatedly post leftist propaganda attempting to spin reality and villify David Parker then whine incessantly among themselves when one like ME does not buy the junk they attempt to sell...

[Peach]

Why don't you do likewise, rather than simply declaring people you disagree with to be "liars"?

It's not that you disagreed with me that got you labeled a liar, although I can see that English might not even be your first language since your reading comprehension skills are so lacking.

First you said that I posted links to a homosexual activism group. It's an easy enough thing to prove but you can't, yet you continue to lie about it.

Then you said that I supported the homosexual agenda. I asked you to post one post I've made in the 8 years I've been here that supports your statement and you, of course, again, can't.

So you see, it's got nothing to do with your disagreeing with me about the Parker story. It's got to do with your lying about me and my position that has given you the label "Liar". Live with it.

[Peach]

They repeatedly post leftist propaganda attempting to spin reality and villify David Parker then whine incessantly among themselves ...

You'll have to link us to the leftist propoganda that I've posted about the Parker story. You won't be able to do it, but waste your time looking and, in the interim, I'll just put you in the liar category.

[Antoninus]

You see to be unaware of the articles I posted that said all the parents, including Parker, were given assurances about what would be taught in the classroom.

I wonder what kind of "assurances" he was given, considering this:

http://estabrook.ci.lexington.ma.us/Diversity/kindergartenbag.html

Diversity Bookbags

Kindergarten

Materials List and Family Activities Books:

The Colors of Us by Karin Katz
Seven year old Lena and her mother observe the variations in the color of their friends' skin, viewed in terms of food and things found in nature.

Henry's First Moon Birthday by Lenore Look
A young girl helps her grandmother with preparations for the traditional Chinese celebration to welcome her new baby brother.

Who's in a Family by Robert Skutch
Shows the various combinations of individuals that can make up a family, emphasizing the positive aspects of different family structures, including grand-parent headed, single-parent, adopted, gay-headed, and mother-father families. Uses examples from the animal kingdom to illustrate how family groupings can differ.


http://estabrook.ci.lexington.ma.us/Diversity/1stgradebags.html

First Grade

Materials List and Family Activities

Books:

All the Colors We Are by Katie Kissinger
The story of how we get our skin color. Provides scientifically accurate explanations that are meaningful to young children. The text is in English and Spanish.

Best, Best Colors by Eric Hoffman
Nate has trouble deciding what his favorite color is, but his two lesbian mamas help him realize that he does not have to have a best, best color.