Skip to comments.
Greely missile site may be locked on North Korea
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner ^
| Tuesday, June 20, 2006
| Sam Bishop
Posted on 06/20/2006 4:53:29 PM PDT by Momaw Nadon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: familyop
Our military won't miss. They can. What counts is how many missiles get through. Some will, some won't. That is what should prevent an enemy from even trying: he won't know which missiles will get through, so his military plans will be useless and what comes back will make his military plans irrelevant anyway. A further complication is that the missile defense would have to be neutralized before the main attack and that will provide enough time to make the necessary response and put an end to the threat. There will be some successful strikes; that is impossible to stop completely.
21
posted on
06/20/2006 5:10:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: RightWhale
I wasn't aware that NK is prepared to launch more than one.
22
posted on
06/20/2006 5:13:11 PM PDT
by
familyop
(Essayons)
To: Momaw Nadon; RightWhale; traumer; abb
I've got a dumb question.
If this is just a test launch -- why shoot it down?
If we are going to shoot it down -- is it really aimed at us?
23
posted on
06/20/2006 5:14:25 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: familyop
If they wish to jump the shark they need launch only one. They have several if they wish to go for it, and they have 30,000 artillery tubes a day's drive from Seoul.
24
posted on
06/20/2006 5:18:00 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: BenLurkin
There is something else going on related to the conditions of ceasefire obtained in the early fifties. Nobody is worried about the missile itself but the fact of its launch in violation of the ceasefire.
25
posted on
06/20/2006 5:20:07 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: BenLurkin
When it is launched, it goes over Japan. (They have done this at least twice before.)
Japan really doesn't like to have errant missiles with (who knows what) payload going over or crashing into their country.
Nor do the U.S. Forces appreciate a missile flying at them or over them. (Case in point, Misawa AB. 1998)
To: BenLurkin
If we are going to shoot it down -- is it really aimed at us? When civilized countries are going to test they notify the world as to trajectory and target. NK is not telling anyone anything. We are well within our rights to practice due diligence.
To: ElkGroveDan
LOL Good one!
Splash one incoming kimchee crockpot duct-taped onto the nose of a Hooflungdong II.
28
posted on
06/20/2006 5:22:48 PM PDT
by
Dumpster Baby
("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
To: Mike Darancette; RightWhale; Jet Jaguar
Those answers help. Thanks!
29
posted on
06/20/2006 5:22:51 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: RightWhale
I think you are talking about more of a Russian / Chinese
scenario. Korea just can't launch multiple missiles, I have no worries about Mr. Ruh Roh.
30
posted on
06/20/2006 5:24:16 PM PDT
by
DAC22
To: DAC22
N Kor can launch multiple missiles against S Kor and Japan. The N Kor ICBM capability is limited to some kind of automatic suicide-by-cop system.
31
posted on
06/20/2006 5:26:55 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: abb
I would like to think we have several cruise missles locked on to the launch site prepared to take the thing out BEFORE it lauches. A ounce of prevention and all that... Remember the post from a day or so ago, showing the 3 aircraft carriers?
A poster asked, "Aren't they suppossed to have submarines with the fleet? Where are the submarines?"
Now you know! :)
32
posted on
06/20/2006 5:29:41 PM PDT
by
LasVegasMac
(Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
To: familyop
Mrs. Submareener says:"We should be very diplomatic and meet them half way! .... Somewhere over the Pacific!"
33
posted on
06/20/2006 5:33:00 PM PDT
by
SubMareener
(Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
To: Enchante
Thanks for posting the link to the NK photos.
IS it just me? All the statues seem to be wearing Western clothes......
34
posted on
06/20/2006 5:36:33 PM PDT
by
ASOC
(Choose between the lesser of two evils and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
To: Momaw Nadon
I don't think we want to say too much in advance of this, as a lot of our stuff is still experimental, and might not necessarily work. However, wouldn't it be great if this thing was lased into smoking lumps of metal, ten feet off the launch pad? We wouldn't confirm or deny anything, of course.
-ccm
35
posted on
06/20/2006 5:40:32 PM PDT
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order)
To: Enchante
N.Korea will either implode or explode within the next 10 years unless they are bailed out by S.Korea or China. The hope is they will implode rather than strike out at the US or its allies.
To: Enchante
100-story hotel in Pyongyang that could not be finished because the construction was so horribly shoddy...Perhaps we can help with its demolition.
37
posted on
06/20/2006 5:47:34 PM PDT
by
Salvey
(ancest)
To: Enchante
100-story hotel in Pyongyang that could not be finished because the construction was so horribly shoddy...Perhaps we can help with its demolition.
38
posted on
06/20/2006 5:47:35 PM PDT
by
Salvey
(ancest)
To: LasVegasMac
nope....he dont know.....very few do......they were prolly already there laying on the ocean floor in silence....
39
posted on
06/20/2006 5:47:56 PM PDT
by
halfright
(--------------------------------------------Bolton/Coulter 08'--------------------------------------)
To: Momaw Nadon
A moment of thanks for the great Ronaldo Maximus and his refusal to submit that all we could do in the face of a rogue launch was "ride it out." President Reagan, I miss you so much.
40
posted on
06/20/2006 5:53:14 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("So to hell with that twerp at the [WaPo]. I've got no time for him on a day like this." Mark Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson