Skip to comments.
Feminist Says Child Rearing not Worthy of Time and Talents of Intelligent Humans
LifeSiteNews ^
| 6/20/06
| Hilary White
Posted on 06/20/2006 3:34:11 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-219 next last
To: RobRoy
A true MALE atheist would be more like the lead character in Natural Born Killers.
That is one of the most absurd and ignorant statements I've read in a while. Morality does not arise from religion, but from within, IMO. It can be reinforced through religion, and also education and example. A punk is still a punk regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.
Atheists can respect others beliefs without mocking them and stereotyping them, however, there will be some who cannot resist such, and most of those are usually of the liberal/socialist persuasion. Some of the more murderous figures in history were deeply religious, remember?
61
posted on
06/20/2006 4:08:51 PM PDT
by
Pox
To: wagglebee
I thought the most important and most formative years were a childs first 5 or so years.
Imagine if every child had a good personal teacher (stay at home mom) for the first 5 or 10 years of their life how much better society and individuals could be for all of us.
62
posted on
06/20/2006 4:09:11 PM PDT
by
garyhope
To: Knitting A Conundrum
Goes with the belief that women who stay home with their children do so because they are incapable of doing anything else. God forbid any woman would CHOOSE this life! /sarc
63
posted on
06/20/2006 4:09:58 PM PDT
by
jnygrl
To: wagglebee
Is there an Email address for this uglydikebitchfreak?
64
posted on
06/20/2006 4:10:24 PM PDT
by
MAWG
(In the shadows, on permanent ambush duty.)
To: wagglebee
Pathetic person.
My wife did not work for 14 years while we homeschooled our daughter. No amount of money could buy a teacher/mother like her. And no feminist could have raised such an exceptional person as my daughter is. And, for the record, there ain't a feminist out there that my wife couldn't run circles around intellectually or otherwise.
65
posted on
06/20/2006 4:11:14 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
To: BenLurkin
If it is, you can bet she can only discuss family issues and childrearing in a theoretical sense.
66
posted on
06/20/2006 4:11:15 PM PDT
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: wagglebee
If only all the feminazis would put their money where their mouth is and get their tubes tied as soon as possible...
67
posted on
06/20/2006 4:11:20 PM PDT
by
Zechariah_8_13
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: jnygrl
I already had my bone fides before I stayed home.
Family is what the past passes down to the future. When the selfishness says don't do it, the future dies a premature birth.
68
posted on
06/20/2006 4:12:30 PM PDT
by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: wagglebee
On News/Activism 03/09/2006 11:58:52 PM EST · 44 replies · 975+ views
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 3/9/06
Zelda's revenge: Gender-neutralizing bill could also jeopardize prom kings, queens A traditional-values organization in California is warning the state's residents that a bill pending in the Legislature, if approved, could remove all references to gender in public schools threatening even references to "mom" or "dad" in textbooks. If the bill, SB 1437, were to become law, warns the Capitol Resource Institute, "it could potentially require gender-neutral bathrooms in our schools and all references to 'husband' and 'wife' or 'mom and dad' removed from school textbooks as the norm." Sponsored by Democratic Sen. Sheila Kuehl a lesbian actress ...
69
posted on
06/20/2006 4:13:04 PM PDT
by
purpleland
(Elegy 9/11/01 Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
To: wagglebee
70
posted on
06/20/2006 4:13:50 PM PDT
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: wagglebee
More news from the orgasm free zone.
71
posted on
06/20/2006 4:13:54 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
To: thoughtomator
Apparently this woman is too slow-witted to understand what any primitive anywhere understands - there is no future without children I an mot a real eloquent guy but; when I look at my beautiful grand daughter I remind myself that she represents all that has ever been and all that ever will be.
To: small voice in the wilderness
That is exactly why it is important for groups like the NEA to get control of public school content.
If you don't breed them yourselves, you need to get your claws into other people's children somehow.
73
posted on
06/20/2006 4:15:17 PM PDT
by
bordergal
(uis)
To: wagglebee
She upbraids women who stay at home for failing the feminist agenda...
I thought it was all about giving women "choices"
... they are not honored and they do not involve risks and the rewards that risk brings
Investing your time, heart, soul, life in another human being requires great personal risk. When that human being is your child, the rewards are great. Stop projecting your own unhappy life on others.
Hirshman admitted that the real intention of the feminist movement was not equality, but to destroy what she calls the unreconstructed family
A great many knew that you were lying all the time. Some are just finding that out.
She writes that the goal was to see as many women as possible abandoning family life
Of course if feminists had admitted this up front, the movement would not have gained so many followers.
She writes of her shock... large numbers were leaving their careers to opt for childrearing
These are the ones now realizing the damage your lies have done
74
posted on
06/20/2006 4:16:25 PM PDT
by
D1X1E
(No, I'm not PC. What about it?)
To: ChessExpert
"Writing in the November 2005 edition of the American Prospect, Hirshman admitted that the real intention of the feminist movement was not equality, but to destroy what she calls the unreconstructed family of a husband and wife rearing children."
What a coincidence?
That's exactly what Satan wants!
75
posted on
06/20/2006 4:16:32 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: wagglebee
"Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.......The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.......Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.....She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness......Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her.......Many daughters have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all......Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.
These "feminists" weary me with their blather. There is much joy and satisfaction...fulfilling of self, to be had in caring for husband and raising healthy, respectful, children. A truly "intelligent" woman knows this. I really feel sorry for any children these woman produce. It sure has become a topsy turvy world.
pattyjo
76
posted on
06/20/2006 4:16:33 PM PDT
by
pj_627
To: BenLurkin
Wasn't she in The Buggles?
77
posted on
06/20/2006 4:16:54 PM PDT
by
Crawdad
(I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
To: mikrofon
If my dog looked like this broad I'd shave her a*s and teach her how to walk backwards.
To: Tall_Texan
Please.....let me be the first to slap you for that comment!
79
posted on
06/20/2006 4:16:59 PM PDT
by
derllak
To: wagglebee
Maybe if none of the feminazis reproduce the gene will die off in a few generations.
I know a couple of guys (in academia) that married self-proclaimed
"strong women".
Generally, they've each told me "my next wife will NOT even have feminist sentiments".
80
posted on
06/20/2006 4:17:01 PM PDT
by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-219 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson