Speaking of hypocrisy, could Dane care less that Tom Tancredo has a 100 ACU rating ?
Tell us Dane, and tell us true: If Tancredo had a Republican primary challenger, who opposed Tancredo on immigration, would you support Tancredo, citing his 100% ACU rating?
I didn't think so.
So, why do you chide us for opposing Cannon, whose position on immigration is 180 degrees from Tancredo? For both you and me, the immigration postion trumps both ACU ratings and experience. If a ham sandwich opposed Tancredo in the Republican primary, you would support the ham sandwich. I don't know if Jacob is a ham sandwich or not, but were he one with no mayo on rye, I'd support him over Cannon.
I didn't think so
And I don't think that Chris Cannon or any other House Republican would set up a PAC with bay buchanan to try to oust good conservatives for pure ego driven spite as tancredo did.
I can't wait till next week when Cannon wins and the tancredo/bay buchanan PAC wipes the grime off their face after another candidate they pushed backfires in their face.
BTW, Chris Cannon has a 100% rating from the ACU for 2005.
The only think Dane cares about is the downfall of the USA so he can assuge his Liberal conscience.
He is the Mods' pet cockroach so they let him spew his anti-American, pro-illegal crap.
He is just a little to the left of Nancy Pelosi. And on par with intelligence.
Your post is basically this: "I worship Tancredo and I will do whatever he tells me." It isn't about challengers to Tancredo. You're changing the subject. The fact is that Jacob is a dud and Tancredo is an opportunistic creep.