My main objection is that the tnacredo/bay buchanan absolutists here all become Jacobots when he proposes his own form of amnesty.
Seems like you all don't like the taste of your owm medicine that you dish out willy nilly to people who do not think as you do, that good conservative Chris Cannon is akin to the anti-christ.
So, you don't have a problem with the pass, rather you object to freepers who do not renounce Jacob when he proposes something akin to amnesty.
Shouldn't we be equally irritated at Dane, who does not immediately embrace Jacob for proposing an amnesty scheme? You've embraced everybody else with an amnesty scheme, from Pence to Kennedy.
Neither anti-amnesty Freepers nor FROBL's like Dane are going to reconsider Jacob based on any proposals Jacob makes. Because the race is solely a referendum on Cannon, and his immigration record.
Do you agree?